Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Aggravated Identity Theft: Open Issues After 'Dubin'

This article discusses three open issues following Dubin v. United States: How appellate courts have been interpreting the “at the crux” language; an emerging circuit split as to whether district courts must specifically instruct juries on the “at the crux” test; and questions not answered in Dubin that will be subject to further development.

10 minute read May 31, 2026 at 11:09 PM
By
Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan Sack
Aggravated Identity Theft: Open Issues After 'Dubin'

Defendants convicted of fraud and other white-collar offenses face a longer sentence if they are also convicted of “aggravated identity theft” under 18 U.S.C. §1028A(a)(1).

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN Business Crimes Bulletin

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Most firms are aiming their newest tools at the work they already do — pouring their most powerful technology into running the same tasks a little faster. But when everyone automates the same tasks at once, no one pulls ahead. That reaches the future a little faster while leaving a firm’s largest opportunity untouched — and that opportunity isn’t doing more of the existing work, but transforming how the high-value work gets done.

June 01, 2026

Artificial intelligence is rapidly embedding itself into legal workflows, but much of the conversation treats all use cases as if they carry the same level of risk, even if they do not. The more useful question is not whether AI works, but where it can be safely applied and where it cannot.

June 01, 2026

There is a difference between deploying AI in an existing workflow and rethinking how legal work gets done. The organizations seeing more fundamental change are the ones redesigning their operating model around what the technology makes possible.

June 01, 2026