Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Contact Us

Subscriptions
To subscribe, for questions about a current subscription, missing issues and the like, contact Customer Service, or call 1-877-256-2472.

Site Licenses
Interested in Site Licenses or Group Accounts? Call 877-807-8076 and a Law Journal Newsletters representative
can assist you.

Editorial

For editorial or content issues, including article submission guidelines, contact the Editor for the publication as listed below.

Managing Editor
Steven Salkin, Esq.

  • Accounting and Financial Planning for Law Firms
  • The Bankruptcy Strategist
  • TBusiness Crimes Bulletin
  • Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy
  • Cybersecurity Law & Strategy
  • Marketing the Law Firm
  • The Intellectual Property Strategist

Editorial Director
Wendy Ampolsk

  • The Bankruptcy Strategist
  • Business Crimes Bulletin
  • Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy
  • The Corporate Counselor
  • Employment Law Strategist
  • Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report
  • LJN’s Equipment Leasing Newsletter
  • Marketing the Law Firm
  • The Matrimonial Strategist
  • Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy
  • New York Real Estate Law Reporter
  • LJN’s Product Liability Law & Strategy

Board of Editors
Each newsletter has a Board of Editors, experts in their fields who supply articles and advice. View the Board of Editors.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Private Equity Valuation: A Significant Decision
    Insiders (and others) in the private equity business are accustomed to seeing a good deal of discussion ' academic and trade ' on the question of the appropriate methods of valuing private equity positions and securities which are otherwise illiquid. An interesting recent decision in the Southern District has been brought to our attention. The case is <i>In Re Allied Capital Corp.</i>, CCH Fed. SEC L. Rep. 92411 (US DC, S.D.N.Y., Apr. 25, 2003). Judge Lynch's decision is well written, the Judge reviewing a motion to dismiss by a business development company, Allied Capital, against a strike suit claiming that Allied's method of valuing its portfolio failed adequately to account for i) conditions at the companies themselves and ii) market conditions. The complaint appears to be, as is often the case, slap dash, content to point out that Allied revalued some of its positions, marking them down for a variety of reasons, and the stock price went down - all this, in the view of plaintiff's counsel, amounting to violations of Rule 10b-5.
    Read More ›