-
Entertainment Law & Finance
In Decision of First Impression, Court Decides ‘Gap Grants’ Can Be Terminated Under §203 of U.S. Copyright Act
Stan Soocher
In the 1976 Copyright Act, Congress inserted a termination right for authors or their successors for pre-January 1, 1978, assignments of copyrighted works. However, the legislators didn’t directly address a key issue: how to determine termination rights for what are known as “gap grant” works — that is, those created post-1977 under copyright assignments made before then.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
FL Federal Court Rules ‘Despacito’ Doesn’t Infringe on ‘Despasito’
Raychel Lean
Federal Judge Kathleen Williams recently analyzed the hit song “Despacito” in a copyright lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, when she found its writers had not copied an earlier Spanish song with the same name.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Film Clips Included in Talent’s Acting Reel Are a Copyright Fair Use
Ninth Circuit Finds Judd/Weinstein Meeting Within Scope of California Sexual Harassment Statute
Personal Manager’s Lawsuit in New York Against Former In-House Counsel Can Move Forward
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
States Win Some and Lose Some on Copyright Front at Supreme Court This Term
Jason Bloom
The Supreme Court decided two copyright cases this term, both involving states. This article discusses the cases and their likely impact on copyright law going forward.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Copyright Considerations In Artificial Intelligence
Shaleen J. Patel and Sushmitha Rajeevan
In the process of creating new content, AI, which has moved into the entertainment industry, may create copies of copyrighted works in memory storage as a byproduct of its overall output sequence. This article explores authorship and ownership of such AI-generated content, and to what extent, if any, can copyrights be infringed upon when AI reproduces copyrighted works for machine learning.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Weighing the Benefits: How Much Weight Will Your Survey Have in Court?
Rene Befurt, Marie Warchol and Anthony Nasr
As consumer surveys become increasingly common forms of evidence in matters involving copyright, patent or trademark infringement, so too do Daubert challenges that attempt to disqualify that evidence. However, getting admitted into court is no guarantee of success — you are not over the entire Daubert hurdle just yet. The next step is ensuring that your survey is convincing the fact finders that your survey’s results are dependable and useful.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Recent Court Views on “Making Available” Controversy in Copyright Infringement
Stan Soocher
Federal courts have long disagreed over whether the unauthorized “making available” of a plaintiff’s works to the public is sufficient to constitute copyright infringement under the U.S. Copyright Act. Two June District Court decisions demonstrated the differences between the views of the Fourth and Ninth Circuits.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Statute of Limitations In Copyright Ownership Disputes: Questions from the Everly Brothers Case
J. Alexander Lawrence
Don and Phil Everly’s flawless harmonies that resulted in a string of hits in the 1950s and '60s regrettably ended in acrimony. The Sixth Circuit recently issued a decision in a dispute between Phil’s heirs and Don over copyright ownership of the No. 1 hit “Cathy’s Clown,” in which concurring Judge Eric E. Murphy raised important questions about when the statute of limitations should begin to run in copyright cases and whether courts have been correctly applying the law.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Commentary: Claims Filing Time Issues on Copyright Ownership from Everly Bros. Case
J. Alexander Lawrence
Don and Phil Everly’s flawless harmonies that resulted in a string of hits in the 1950s and '60s regrettably ended in acrimony. The Sixth Circuit recently issued a decision in a dispute between Phil’s heirs and Don over copyright ownership of the No. 1 hit “Cathy’s Clown,” in which concurring Judge Eric E. Murphy raised important questions about when the statute of limitations should begin to run in copyright cases and whether courts have been correctly applying the law.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Recent Court Views on “Making Available” Controversy In Copyright Infringement
Stan Soocher
Federal courts have long disagreed over whether the unauthorized “making available” of a plaintiff’s works to the public is sufficient to constitute copyright infringement under the U.S. Copyright Act. Two June District Court decisions demonstrated the differences between the views of the Fourth and Ninth Circuits.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Defense Counsel Discuss Outcome in Dance Steps Case
Jenna Greene
Kirkland & Ellis has notched a win in cutting-edge litigation that questions the protectability of dance steps, what constitutes choreography and the relationship between copyright, and right of publicity and trademark law.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Federal Appeals Courts Weight in On Accruals for Copyright Infringement vs. Ownership Claims
Stan Soocher
The U.S. Copyright Act states that a civil copyright action must be filed within three years of its accrual. How this applies to copyright infringement and to copyright ownership claims, including in the same case, isn’t always clear. But two recent federal appeals courts decisions have provided guidance on the differences in accrual for each of these copyright claims.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
9th Circuit Says Copyright Attorney Fees Available in Declaratory Suits
Scott Graham
A declaratory judgment action for copyright abandonment can give rise to fee shifting under the Copyright Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in a case of first impression.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Ownership and Fair Use
Shaleen J. Patel and Sushmitha Rajeevan
Machine learning allows certain AI to create entirely new content based upon the materials it used to learn. In the process of creating new content, AI may create copies of copyrighted works in memory storage as a byproduct of its overall output sequence. This article explores authorship and ownership of such AI-generated content, and to what extent, if any, can copyrights be infringed upon when AI reproduces copyrighted works for machine learning.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
IP News
Howard Shire and Shaleen Patel
Article III Inter Partes Review Decision Precluded By Congress, SCOTUS Rules
SDNY: Video Game Makers Not Violating Copyright with NBA Player Tattoos
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Supreme Court Rules States Cannot Be Involuntarily Liable for Copyright Infringement
Shaleen J. Patel
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individual states are free to commit copyright infringement. The Court held that Congress attempted to abrogate states’ sovereign immunity in an unconstitutional manner when enacting the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990 (CRCA).
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Defending Suits Brought By Copyright Trolls
Nancy J. Mertzel
An overview of copyright troll litigation and explores potential litigation strategies for responding to troll cases.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Copyright Termination Claims Found Timely, But Loan-Out Companies Can’t Terminate Copyright Assignments
Judge Unhappy With Damon Dash’s Trial Behavior
New York Federal Court Sees No Copyright Infringement or False Endorsement in Use of Mural in Film
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Swedish Music Industry Views: Part Two
Stan Soocher
Part Two of a Two Part Article
This article discusses, among other things, the Swedish music industry perspective on the European Union’s Copyright Directive, the growth of multi-country music licensing hubs and the impact of Brexit.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Kozinski Angle In 9th Circuit’s Led Zeppelin Ruling
Scott Graham
Defendants Led Zeppelin and its music labels were the winners in the copyright decision by the Ninth Circuit over the song “Stairway to Heaven.” But the estate of songwriter Randy Wolfe (p/k/a California) wasn’t the only one who got the short end. Among the collateral damage from the ruling was a 2002 precedent written by former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski that endorsed the so-called “inverse-ratio” rule.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
IP News
Shaleen J. Patel
VARA Lives On: A $6.75M Lesson on Respecting Moral Rights
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
“Potentially Monumental” Ninth Circuit En Banc Decision in Infringement Case Over Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway to Heaven”
Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
For the past five years, the copyright bar and the music industry have carefully followed the many twists and turns of the potentially monumental infringement case that asserted that the opening of the iconic Led Zeppelin song “Stairway to Heaven” was copied from the introduction of a little-known 1967 instrumental “Taurus,” written by the late Randy California. In March 2020, a unanimous en banc panel of the entire Ninth Circuit affirmed portions of a prior three-judge appellate ruling that “Stairway” did not infringe the Spirit song — and in the process resolved some thorny issues involving substantial similarity and copyright scope that will be important for future litigants
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Kozinski Angle In 9th Circuit’s Led Zeppelin Ruling
Scott Graham
Defendants Led Zeppelin and its music labels were the winners in the copyright decision by the Ninth Circuit over the song “Stairway to Heaven.” But the estate of songwriter Randy Wolfe (p/k/a California) wasn’t the only one who got the short end. Among the collateral damage from the ruling was a 2002 precedent written by former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski that endorsed the so-called “inverse-ratio” rule.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
CASE Act Explained
Ryan W. Morris
The Copyright Alternative in Small Claims Enforcement Act is a proposed congressional amendment to the current copyright statute that would create an alternative dispute resolution program for copyright small claims and other legal proceedings.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
A Primer on Rights in Video Game Avatars
Andrea Perez
Recent lawsuits have grappled with the fair use of one’s likeness in video games, attempting to apply established order to a changing field.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Los Angeles Federal Judge Tosses Out Jury’s Infringement Verdict Against Katy Perry in “Dark Horse” Song Case
Sales Agreement for Film Assets of Distributor in Bankruptcy Doesn’t Affect Separate Lender for One of Debtor’s Movies
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Swedish Music Industry Views as European Union Countries Work on Drafting Home Laws for Enacting EU Copyright Directive
Stan Soocher
This article is Part One of a two-part article
This article examines the Copyright Directive and music-industry structure issues through the lens of Sweden, which has both a robust music business and a strong technology sector, two divergent perspectives in the development of the directive.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Exercising the Extraterritorial Limitation on U.S. Copyright Law
Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
A necessary element of secondary liability claims is an underlying infringement of U.S. copyright law by a third party. If the activities abroad are not subject to the law, the predicate direct infringement required for the imposition of secondary liability cannot be established.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
‘Vanicorn’ Lawsuit Filed over Pixar, Disney Film
Scott Graham
A unicorn-loving tattoo artist alleges that Pixar and Disney have tricked her into letting them use her “Vanicorn” in the upcoming film Onward. Her suit accuses the companies of copyright infringement, and violations of state and federal laws protecting artwork.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
When Are Short Phrases in Songs Protectable?
Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
It’s a common fact pattern: A songwriter alleges that another songwriter has infringed the lyrics of Song A by using a similar short phrase, frequently a current slang phrase, in the lyrics of Song B. Claims like this do not often succeed because “words and short phrases such as names, titles, and slogans” are “not subject to copyright.”
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
How Judges Are Interpreting Supreme Court’s Copyright ‘Registration’ Ruling
Stan Soocher
In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, under 17 U.S.C. §411(a), “registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright” — that is, acts on a registration application, rather than when an applicant delivers the registration materials to the Copyright Office.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Challenges to Evidence of Copyright Ownership
Stan Soocher
There has been a long-term debate over whether sound recordings can be copyright works made for hire. Sound recordings don’t appear in the list of works for hire set out in §101 of the Copyright Act of 1976, though record labels argue recordings can be deemed so as a “compilation” or a “contribution to a collective work,” per §101.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Players on the Move
Dan Clark
Copyright Office General Counsel Moves to MPAA
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Supreme Court, Finally, Takes Up Google v. Oracle
Scott Graham
The U.S. Supreme Court has jumped into a titanic copyright battle between Oracle Corp. and Google LLC with both barrels. The court’s involvement is sure to reignite a 50-year-old debate over how much, if any, software should be subject to copyright, and the contours of the fair use defense in the digital age.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Photo Cases Test Copyright Law and Embedded Tweets
Raychel Lean
A New Yorker who settled a copyright lawsuit against several news outlets over a photo he took of star quarterback Tom Brady and Boston Celtics manager Danny Ainge has struck again. This time he’s suing a radio station owner in Florida federal courts in a case that could test the boundaries of an emerging area of copyright law, raising major questions about how media companies incorporate social media posts into online stories.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Filers Beware: No Expedited Discovery in Copyright Suits
Charles Toutant
Litigation tactics employed by frequent filers of copyright infringement suits may face heavy criticism in light of a recent ruling by a federal judge in New Jersey.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Sparks From En Banc Arguments In Song Suit Against Led Zeppelin
Scott Graham
There was much harmony along with a few discordant notes as an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit took up the copyright case involving Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway to Heaven.”
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Fourth Circuit Rules that Website’s Unauthorized Posting of Stock Photograph Was Not ‘Fair Use’
Michael W. Mitchell and Edward Roche
The decision in Brammer v. Violent Hues sheds some light on when re-posting will be a “fair use” and when it will give rise to liability.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Analysis of Warhol Art Fair Use Ruling
Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held that a series of silkscreen paintings and prints by Andy Warhol based on a photograph of music legend Prince taken by Lynn Goldsmith constituted a transformative fair use.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
9th Circuit Says End Steinbeck Copyright Fight
Alaina Lancaster
In a nearly half-century-long legal dispute over the rights to John Steinbeck’s works, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court‘s $5 million compensatory damages award against the author’s daughter-in-law but vacated punitive damages against the heir.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Seeing Green: Protecting Brands In the Cannabis Industry
David S. Gold
Branding is not a new concept, nor are the various intellectual property laws that protect brands. What is new to most is how this burgeoning industry can take advantage of those laws within the context of state and federal restrictions.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
The Interaction of International Law and U.S. Copyright–Assignment Terminations
Stan Soocher
That U.S. copyright-assignment termination issues are among the most complex in the copyright field becomes even more apparent when attempts to reclaim copyrights involve aspects of international law. Few courts have ruled, however, on the impact of international law on U.S. copyright-assignment terminations. The most recent to do so is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Ennio Morricone Music Inc. v. Bixio Music Group Ltd.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
What’s Behind the U.S. Justice Department’s Latest Review of PRO Consent Decrees
Karen Hoffman Lent and Kenneth Schwartz
In June, the DOJ announced its plans to review the two music-licensing antitrust consent decrees that have been in place, in some shape or form, for almost 80 years. Due to this newly initiated review, the competitive mechanisms that dictate how music is broadcast, streamed or played live could drastically change.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Third Circuit Clarifies View on Copyright Ownership, Injunctive Relief
Charles Toutant
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit tossed out an injunction against sales of a book by Commerce Bank founder Vernon Hill II even after finding that the work infringed on a manuscript copyright owned by TD Bank.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Photographs on the Internet: Circuit Courts Examine Copyright Infringement
Kyle-Beth Hilfer
Two recent circuit court cases clarified copyright infringement of photographs on the Internet. Both cases serve as cautionary tales for those who takes photographs for their websites from the Internet without investigating copyright rights.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
IP News
Howard Shire and Christine Weller
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Bombardier
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Hey! That’s My Move!
Erin Hennessy, Annie Allison and Logan Kotler
Copyright, Fortnite and the Ability to Protect How You Shake Your Groove Thing
The U.S. Supreme Court just crashed the copyright world’s latest dance party — stepping on the toes of a soiree of copyright infringement lawsuits against videogame developer Epic Games, the creator of Fortnite.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
High Court’s View of ‘Full Costs’ in Copyright Litigation
Scott Graham
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court, led by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, held that the phrase “full costs” in §505 of the Copyright Act means all of the costs specifically enumerated in the general cost-shifting statutes, such as transcripts and fees for court-appointed experts and interpreters.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling on Copyright Registration
Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
The Supreme Court had granted cert in Fourth Estate to resolve a split in the federal circuit courts as to whether §411(a) of the Copyright Act could be read to allow commencement of an infringement action once a registration application filed with the Copyright Office is complete (the “application approach”) or, instead, only (subject to limited statutorily specified exceptions) upon issuance by the Copyright Office of the registration (the “registration approach”).
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The Supreme Court Finally Resolves An Old, Vexing Question: Does “Registration” Mean “Registration”? Answer: “Yes.”
James A. Trigg and Bethany R. Nelson
In Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split decades in the making by holding that a copyright is not “registered” within the meaning of the Copyright Act unless and until a registration certificate actually has issued.
Read More ›
