Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement At the Supreme Court Image

Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement At the Supreme Court

Catherine Nyarady & Crystal Parker

In February 2024, the Fourth Circuit addressed a jury’s 2020 damages award of $1 billion finding Cox secondarily liable for its subscribers’ copyright infringement through illegal copying of copyrighted songs. Both Cox and Sony filed petitions for certiorari.

Features

Combatting Patent Trolls Image

Combatting Patent Trolls

Rob Maier

A subject of extensive debate within the U.S. patent system has been the classification of “patent trolls” — most widely defined as individuals or companies that acquire patents solely for the purpose of assertion, often in cases without any merit, but which leverage the high cost of patent litigation defense to force small settlements.

Features

What Can IP Practitioners Expect from Trump 2.0? Image

What Can IP Practitioners Expect from Trump 2.0?

W. Karl Renner & Kristi Sawert & Megan Chacon & Michael Portnov

President-elect Donald Trump did not make intellectual property (IP) policy a major focus of his 2024 election campaign, but his policy priorities are nearly certain to have a profound effect on the IP landscape when he takes office in January.

Features

Do Pharmaceutical Patents Do More Harm Than Good? Image

Do Pharmaceutical Patents Do More Harm Than Good?

Ikenna C. Ejimonyeugwo

This article discusses how a pharmaceutical patent works, its role in drug development, and the polarizing impact it has on global health care.

Features

An NDA Is Not a ‘Magic Talisman’ for Trade Secret Protection Image

An NDA Is Not a ‘Magic Talisman’ for Trade Secret Protection

Stephen M. Kramarsky

An NDA can cover information that would not qualify as a trade secret under state or federal law, and it can provide limited contractual protection to that information. But it is not a “magic talisman” for the protection of intellectual property, and it cannot create trade secret protection where it would not otherwise exist.

Columns & Departments

IP News Image

IP News

The Intellectual Property Strategist Staff

A look at the latest developments in intellectual property law.

Features

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support

Daniel Muino & Charles Provine

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Features

Artist Challenges Copyright Office Refusal to Register Award-Winning AI-Assisted Work Image

Artist Challenges Copyright Office Refusal to Register Award-Winning AI-Assisted Work

Emily Bullis

Copyright law has long struggled to keep pace with advances in technology, and the debate around the copyrightability of AI-assisted works is no exception. At issue is the human authorship requirement: the principle that a work must have a human author to be eligible for copyright protection. While the Copyright Office has previously cited this "bedrock requirement of copyright" to reject registrations, recent decisions have focused on the role of human authorship in the context of AI.

Features

The Federal Circuit Clarifies Who Can Be an Expert In Patent Cases Image

The Federal Circuit Clarifies Who Can Be an Expert In Patent Cases

Jim Day & Raven Quesenberry

In September 2024, the Federal Circuit clarified the necessary qualifications for a technical expert to testify in a patent lawsuit, holding that while an expert must possess ordinary skill in the art, they need not have possessed such skill "at the time of the alleged invention."

Features

Knockoffs: Are They Always Infringing? Image

Knockoffs: Are They Always Infringing?

Steven D. Lustig

When something is referred to as a "knockoff" it typically implies that the knockoff product is similar in appearance to an earlier product and is unlawful. But that is not always the case. Indeed, there can be infringing knockoffs and noninfringing knockoffs. It depends on the facts and circumstances. To appreciate the difference, a look into the general rules and some specific cases is needed.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES