Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

Litigation

  • On Jan. 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its significant en banc decision in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom. In that decision, the Federal Circuit held that the time-bar of 35 U.S.C. §315(b) is reviewable on appeal, thus overturning a prior panel decision and opening the door for parties to challenge how the USPTO has interpreted and applied that statutory provision.

    February 01, 2018Jon E. Wright and Pauline M. Pelletier
  • Several leading law firms in the National Football League concussion settlement litigation are taking issue with an expert report that suggested slashing attorney fee recoveries. More than 10 law firms have filed responses to a December expert report that recommended capping attorney fees.

    February 01, 2018Max Mitchell
  • In a nearly 50-page precedential opinion in a ruling of great significance to the entertainment industry, a TTAB panel of judges recently underscored the need to prove actual use in commerce in order to register a trademark, regardless of how low the standard for use under the Lanham Act has recently become.

    February 01, 2018Howard J. Shire and Jeremy S. Boczko
  • What They Say and Do Not Say

    Part Three of a Three-Part Article

    The question remains: Is the defendant in a False Claims Act matter barred from discussing the case, as are the relator and the government?

    February 01, 2018Andrew W. Schilling and Megan E. Whitehill
  • Town Board Failed to Take 'Hard Look' at Amendment
    Jurisdictional Determination from Army Corps
    Developer Failed to Allege Concrete Injury

    February 01, 2018ssalkin
  • On Jan. 8, 2018, Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) introduced the Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act of 2018, which is designed to prevent forum shopping in Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, a practice that has resulted in a concentration of bankruptcy cases in a few districts.

    February 01, 2018ljnstaff
  • Refusal Is an Unconstitutional Violation of Free Speech

    On Dec. 15, 2017, a unanimous Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that despite Appellant's mark comprising “immoral or scandalous” matter, the PTO could no longer refuse federal registration of such marks on the grounds that this refusal violated the free speech clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    February 01, 2018Stacey C. Kalamaras
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Eni Head to Trial over Nigeria Corruption Allegations

    February 01, 2018ssalkin