With eye-popping damages at stake, a federal magistrate refused to allow consumer plaintiffs to move forward as a class with claims that Hulu violated their privacy by sharing the videos they viewed.
- July 02, 2014Julia Love
Chasing clients for legal fees can be a complex matter, and the Clinton recording masters dispute has as many twists and turns as the polyrhythms on a funk track.
July 02, 2014Stan SoocherManagement Company Gets Preliminary Injunction to Block Use of Artist Name It Created
New York Federal Judge Sees No Substantial Similarity Between Plaintiff's Rap Song and Usher's R&B Song
Pennsylvania Federal Court Finds Songwriter Gave Usher Implied LicenseJuly 02, 2014Stan SoocherWith eye-popping damages at stake, a federal magistrate refused to allow consumer plaintiffs to move forward as a class with claims that Hulu violated their privacy by sharing the videos they viewed.
July 02, 2014Julia LoveIn Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., a unanimous Supreme Court held that the test for patent claim definiteness in 35 U.S.C. '112, '2 (2006) "require[s] that a patent's claims, viewed in light of the specification and prosecution history, inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty."
July 02, 2014Darren DonnellyAn in-depth look at various key cases.
July 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |The U.S. Supreme Court will soon be grappling with classic First Amendment principles in the modern-day social-media context of a case involving threatening posts on Facebook.
July 02, 2014Tony MauroThe Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Civil Rules has proposed another round of Rules amendments. If enacted, the resulting package of amendments could affect most aspects of federal discovery practice and possibly decrease eDiscovery burdens and costs for courts, clients, and counsel alike.
July 02, 2014Philip FavroBecoming the next Target can be toxic for companies, particularly those in the finance, health-care and retail sectors, which usually collect and store customers' personally identifiable information (PII).
July 02, 2014Rebekah MintzerIn Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc., the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that inducement of infringement under 35 U.S.C. '271(b) requires an act of direct infringement under '271(a) ' that is, one entity must perform all steps of a claimed method.
July 02, 2014Scott F. Llewellyn and Ryan Malloy

