The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, that a legally obtained copyrighted work can be imported into the United States and resold without permission from the copyright owner, even if it was manufactured and sold overseas, has broad legal ramifications going forward, intellectual property attorneys say.
- April 30, 2013Lisa Shuchman
Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
April 30, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
April 30, 2013Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Ksenia Takhistova and Joseph MercadantePublishers frequently charge different prices in foreign markets, and they have argued that allowing unrestricted importation threatens that practice. In March, the Supreme Court squarely addressed this issue for the first time in John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. Kirtsaeng and held that the first-sale doctrine does in fact apply to copies made overseas and, as a result, these copies could be purchased in foreign markets and legally resold in the United States.
April 30, 2013Andrew PequignotHighlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
April 30, 2013Chris BussertAnalysis and discussion of several major rulings.
April 29, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Two recent rulings and what they mean.
April 29, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |A look at Pomerance v. McGrath and what it means.
April 29, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |An in-depth look at White v. Farrell, decided last month, and what it means for breach of a contract.
April 29, 2013Stewart E. Sterk

