In June, Southern District Judge Barbara Jones had declared in Windsor v. United States that DOMA is an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause, concluding the law bore no relationship to the preservation of marriage. On Oct. 18, the Second Circuit announced its agreement.
- October 29, 2012Janice G. Inman
This article highlights several practical tips that will increase the probability that a forum selection clause will be enforced to its maximum effect.
October 24, 2012Patrick M. NorthenThis article considers what might happen to a secured claim if the creditor fails, or elects not, to participate in its debtor's bankruptcy case.
October 24, 2012Alan M. Christenfeld and Barbara M. GoodsteinAn in-depth analysis at a recent key ruling.
September 28, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
September 27, 2012Howard J. Shire and Joseph MercadanteAlleging "Online" Distribution Not Enough to Establish Simultaneous International "Publication"
Expert Report on Value of "Bogart" Ruled ReliableSeptember 27, 2012Stan SoocherThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the heirs to Marilyn Monroe's estate did not inherit the rights to her publicity because she was a resident of New York, where such rights are not recognized posthumously.
September 27, 2012Amanda BronstadFor all employers, especially franchisors and franchisees who often utilize unique employment models, Concepcion and the cases interpreting it provide valuable lessons. Businesses have been given a road map for every contractual agreement in which arbitration provisions might appear, and the signposts point to fairness.
September 27, 2012K. Bryance MethenyTwo New Jersey defense lawyers have been hit with ethics charges for having used Facebook in an unfriendly fashion.
September 27, 2012Mary Pat GallagherIn George Campbell Painting v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department ruled that because an insurer had sufficient knowledge of a late notice defense nearly four months before it provided a written disclaimer to the insured, the disclaimer was ineffective as a matter of law.
September 27, 2012Richard J. Geddes and Sarah Champion

