Recent amendments to DRL ' 236 Part B(9)(b) have changed the grounds for modifying a child support award. These changes have caused a profound shift in whether, and under what circumstances, parties should opt out of the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA).
- July 27, 2011Carol Most and Adam Schneid
Visitation and child support issues can become intertwined in extreme cases of visitation denial. In these cases, a noncustodial parent may petition to suspend child support. A look at relevant case law.
July 27, 2011Jerome A. Wisselman and Randall MaloneNew York's recent passage of the Marriage Equality Act no more opened up the federal government to recognizing same-sex marriage than did passage of similar legislation in Connecticut or Vermont.
July 27, 2011Janice G. InmanIn-depth analysis of cases of importance to you and your practice.
July 27, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |This article discusses the judicial and legislative bases for the right to independent counsel and identifies situations/circumstances where courts have or have not found that such a right exists.
July 27, 2011Martin J. O'Leary and Kirsten A. MickelsonRecent developments are highlighted.
July 27, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |When it comes to quality of medical care in the United States, all patients are not treated equally. Minorities, poor people and those without private insurance are more likely to receive substandard care and to suffer the consequences.
July 27, 2011Christopher D. BernardWe have seen how the characterization of a tort as either one of medical malpractice or ordinary negligence can have significant impacts on how a case progresses. Will a medical expert's opinion be needed before the case can proceed?
July 27, 2011Michael C. KsiazekThe decision in ATT Mobility v. Concepcion was announced on April 27, just a few days before a panel of three franchise attorneys presented an update on arbitration trends at the 44th Annual International Franchise Association Legal Symposium.
July 27, 2011Kevin AdlerThis article focuses on how one state, Maryland, has chosen to address first-party bad faith claims arising out of property and casualty insurance policies. Maryland's experience handling these disputes teaches lessons to both carriers and insureds.
July 27, 2011William J. Carter, James P. Steele and Mariana D. Bravo

