Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

Litigation

  • cyberspace enables anyone willing to spring for a domain name and pay an Internet service provider $15 a month to become a "publisher." And even better for these latter-day Horace Greeleys, they can corral a limitless number of "reporters" without paying one red cent. Small wonder that blogging has become a force of mainstream media. Indeed, blog owners basically need only to grant anonymity to those who post to their Web sites.

    November 25, 2008Joel Cohen and Katherine A. Helm
  • Crew Member Injury/Employee Status
    Merchandising Rights/Film Remakes
    Trademark Infringement/First Amendment Defense

    November 25, 2008Stan Soocher
  • A magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that a copyright and trademark infringement defendant couldn't file an impleader action against his former lawyer for secondary or derivative liability.

    November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana grant- ed a defendant's motion to transfer to New York federal court a suit over the alleged unauthorized use of the names and likenesses of legendary baseball players, including Lou Gehrig, Thurman Munson and Jackie Robinson.

    November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Who's doing what; who's moving where.

    November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • A look at recent rulings of importance.

    November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Plaintiffs' attorneys have filed several lawsuits in recent months involving two recalled drugs, the generic blood thinner heparin, and prescription medication Digitek, that could signal a clean break from past actions that were far less successful against drugs Vioxx and Paxil.

    November 25, 2008Amanda Bronstad
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • A recent ruling by the Court of Appeals puts a whole new, and subjective, definition to the term "cohabitation": At the time that the agreement was entered into, what did the parties themselves mean when they stated the word "cohabit"?

    November 25, 2008Janice G. Inman