cyberspace enables anyone willing to spring for a domain name and pay an Internet service provider $15 a month to become a "publisher." And even better for these latter-day Horace Greeleys, they can corral a limitless number of "reporters" without paying one red cent. Small wonder that blogging has become a force of mainstream media. Indeed, blog owners basically need only to grant anonymity to those who post to their Web sites.
- November 25, 2008Joel Cohen and Katherine A. Helm
This article explores a social networking site user's right to privacy, an adversary's right to obtain information from that site, and the admissibility of the information.
November 25, 2008Ronald J. Levine and Susan L. Swatski-LebsonCrew Member Injury/Employee Status
Merchandising Rights/Film Remakes
Trademark Infringement/First Amendment DefenseNovember 25, 2008Stan SoocherA magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that a copyright and trademark infringement defendant couldn't file an impleader action against his former lawyer for secondary or derivative liability.
November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana grant- ed a defendant's motion to transfer to New York federal court a suit over the alleged unauthorized use of the names and likenesses of legendary baseball players, including Lou Gehrig, Thurman Munson and Jackie Robinson.
November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Who's doing what; who's moving where.
November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |A look at recent rulings of importance.
November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Plaintiffs' attorneys have filed several lawsuits in recent months involving two recalled drugs, the generic blood thinner heparin, and prescription medication Digitek, that could signal a clean break from past actions that were far less successful against drugs Vioxx and Paxil.
November 25, 2008Amanda BronstadRecent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
November 25, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |A recent ruling by the Court of Appeals puts a whole new, and subjective, definition to the term "cohabitation": At the time that the agreement was entered into, what did the parties themselves mean when they stated the word "cohabit"?
November 25, 2008Janice G. Inman

