Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Litigation

  • Analysis of recent rulings.

    August 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Everything contained in this issue, in an easy-to-read format.

    August 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Attorneys representing property owners are often requested to document arrangements for very short-term and temporary usage of property. "I don't want a lease; just a license agreement will be fine," is the frequent form of the request. Assuming that the client's request is not merely an attempt to keep the legal fees down, is such a request one that makes sense from an owner's point of view? More important, can a careful attorney respond positively?

    August 27, 2008Lawrence A. Kobrin
  • National rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    August 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings you need to know.

    August 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Given how large the awards are when there is a verdict against a physician, many in the medical profession and their defense teams have come to believe that juries are random and unfair. The conventional wisdom seems to be that judge-made decisions are a safer bet for med-mal defendants. Is this true?

    August 27, 2008Linda S. Crawford
  • Courts have historically been divided over several key elements with respect to what a plaintiff must prove to support a claim for medical monitoring. In this article, we review recent decisions regarding medical monitoring and assess whether there has been any consensus among the courts as to whether an actual, present physical injury is required to support a medical monitoring claim and whether class certification is appropriate for medical monitoring claims.

    August 27, 2008Vivian M. Quinn and Tracey B. Ehlers
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    August 26, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • In a little-noticed paragraph of the significant decision in Wissink v. Wissink, 301 AD2d 36 (2d Dept. 2002), the court held that evidence of certain economically abusive behavior was relevant in a custody case and should not be excluded. This is a very important holding that should be examined by judges and attorneys and applied in other cases.

    August 26, 2008Nancy Erickson
  • Important rulings in neighboring states.

    July 31, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |