There have been numerous developments in U.S. criminal antitrust law over the last half-decade ' in legislation, judicial opinions, and the publicly stated enforcement policy of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ). While none have been watershed events individually, in the aggregate they fundamentally impact representation of companies or individuals under investigation for antitrust violations. This article outlines the cumulative effect of these developments and indicates how representation of companies under antitrust investigation has changed over this period.
- February 27, 2008David J. Laing
Commentary on the latest cases.
February 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Everything contained in this issue, in an easy-to-read format.
February 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |On Jan. 15, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta, the case that has been called 'the most important securities law case to reach the Court this decade' and 'the securities lawyer's Roe v. Wade.' While the case had both domestic and international corporations concerned about its potential to dramatically expand the scope of 10b-5 claims in order to target third parties doing business with public companies that concern can now be laid to rest.
February 26, 2008Sarah L. Reid and Damaris M. DiazThe U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently issued a decision in In re Coudert Brothers LLP concerning the treatment of an attorney's retaining lien in the bankruptcy of a law firm. The decision does not alter the analysis that would obtain under applicable state law, and serves as an important reminder to attorneys that their liens to secure payment of amounts owed by clients and former clients depend on state law and are not enhanced in the bankruptcy setting.
February 26, 2008John J. RapisardiA discussion of the aftermath of the recent decision, In re Northwest Airlines Corp., 483 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2007), in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a federal court may enjoin a strike by employees covered under the Railway Labor Act (the 'RLA') following rejection of their collective bargaining agreement.
February 26, 2008Catherine Steege and David H. HixsonA new generation of food-related litigation, and class action litigation in particular, has been launched.
February 01, 2008Sarah L. OlsonAll of us who are interested in criminal law have seen the 'Battle of the Experts' ad nauseum. The prosecution trots out an 'expert' with enough acronyms…
January 31, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

