Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Litigation

  • Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

    June 28, 2007ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The latest news for your review.

    June 28, 2007ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    June 28, 2007ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • DVD Distribution/Product Labeling
    Film-Payroll Services/Completion-Bond Reinsurers
    Recording Agreements/Fiduciary Obligation
    Songwriting/No Partnership Found

    June 28, 2007Stan Soocher
  • Production of Agreements/Motion Picture and Screenplay Rights
    Recording Agreements/Non-Exclusivity

    June 28, 2007ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that the brief inclusion ' in a segment of the animated TV-series 'Family Guy' ' of a 'Charwoman'-like character from and a theme similar to the 'Carol Burnett Show' constituted a copyright fair use. Burnett v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., CV 07-01723 DDP.

    June 28, 2007ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • It's possible to win the war but lose the final battle. Although former Philadelphia Phillies pitcher Tyler Green prevailed in his lawsuit against a man who used his name for a sports-handicapping Web site, he has now lost his appeal demanding that the man be ordered to reimburse Green's legal fees. And for Green's lawyer, John P. Elliott, the decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit came with a one-two punch. Not only was Elliott denied a fee award, but he also got a stern finger-wagging from an appellate judge who complained that a letter he wrote to the defendant was 'particularly combative' and employed a 'most unwise tactic.' Green v. Fornario, 06-2649.

    June 28, 2007Shannon P. Duffy
  • When a supervisor is identified in a lawsuit as the alleged harasser, the employer may still avoid liability, under certain circumstances, as long as the harassment did not result in a 'tangible employment action.' To this end, most, if not all, employers are intimately familiar with the U.S. Supreme Court's Faragher and Ellerth decisions issued in 1998. Yet during the past eight years since the decisions, employers have faced the brunt of scrutiny from courts evaluating the application of this affirmative defense.

    June 28, 2007Debra M. Leder
  • On May 29, the Supreme Court made it significantly easier for employers to defend against Title VII workplace discrimination claims that are based on long-ago decisions about salary and raises. By a 5-4 vote, the Court said that employees claiming they received disparate treatment based on gender or race must do so within 180 days of the original discriminatory action ' not within 180 days of their last paycheck. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 05-1074.

    June 28, 2007Tony Mauro