Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Litigation

  • During the late summer and early autumn of 2006, the medical community began to express second thoughts about the safety of drug-coated cardiac stents, which have in recent years been given credit for reducing the frequency of complications arising from the use of a previous generation of stents. The publicity generated by the news media interested me in my professional role representing health care providers, and for personal reasons as well.

    November 29, 2006Michael D. Brophy
  • Like New Jersey, New York generally does not consider fault when distributing marital assets. (See Strober L: Marital Misconduct and Alimony. The Matrimonial Strategist, November 2006.) However, there are circumstances under which both states will factor in fault.

    November 29, 2006Myrna Felder
  • Recent cases in e-commerce law and in the e-commerce industry.

    November 28, 2006Julian S. Millstein, Edward A. Pisacreta and Jeffrey D. Neuburger
  • When Congress passed the Class Action Fairness Act ('CAFA') in 2005, committee reports showed that several legislators believed the Act would shift from defendant to plaintiff the burden of proof with respect to the existence of federal removal jurisdiction. CAFA's legislative history contains statements from several members of Congress indicating that a plaintiff opposing removal under the Act would have the burden of establishing the absence of federal jurisdiction. For a short period following CAFA's passage, certain federal district courts found this legislative history controlling and held that CAFA shifted the burden of proof.

    November 28, 2006Gregg A. Farley and Christopher K. Pelham
  • Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

    November 28, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    November 28, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • False Endorsement Claims
    First-Amendment Defense
    Sublicensing Limits

    November 02, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • As the copyright terms of many iconic, character-based works of the 20th Century near closure, owners of these works face the question as to what extent they can enjoy exclusive rights in the characters they have created. Enterprising third parties raise the related question: Does the expiration of copyright mean these works and characters can be freely exploited? Once a copyright term lapses, an original work is said to pass into the public domain, available for all to freely copy and exploit. However, continued trademark protection for a character may delay or complicate the character's passage into the public domain. A careful analysis of fundamental principles of trademark and copyright law and relevant case law illuminate certain legal guideposts for navigating through the complexities of character protection.

    November 02, 2006Paul A. Lee