When confronted by contract after contract, day after day, which ones should an e-commerce executive actually read, so that she can spend some time running the business requiring all those contracts, and maybe even make some money?
- February 01, 2012Stanley P. Jaskiewicz
This article is the second installment in an ongoing series focusing on accounting and financial matters for corporate counsel.
February 01, 2012Michael GoldmanBy now, most corporations and law firms understand the complexities and realities of eDiscovery, and many organizations are re-examining their e-discovery processes and tools to gain efficiencies and reduce costs across the Electronic Data Reference Model (EDRM). With more options than ever before, litigation support professionals, lawyers and IT staff are grappling with these questions: Can my organization better manage costs and increase control over discovery by bringing e-discovery tools in-house or in-firm? Which components of the
February 01, 2012Jason HuESI discovery disputes have become protracted for one common reason: The parties do not sufficiently prepare for ESI discovery. Enter the Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program.
February 01, 2012TJ Thurston and Scott DevensLast month, the authors discussed the fact that proxy access remains a "hot-button" corporate governance issue and the outcome of the debate remains uncertain. This discussion continues herein.
February 01, 2012By Robert S. Reder, David Schwartz and Roxana AziziSurely the most obscure feature of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is the issuance and use of opinions. Here's how they work.
February 01, 2012James ChingThe recent recession has exacerbated the fundamental challenge faced by general counsel: the selection and management of outside counsel.
February 01, 2012Jonathan BaumAnalysis of a recent important ruling.
January 31, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Key happenings in neighboring states.
January 31, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Automatic orders are particularly vexing because the "binding" quality is almost secondary to its service with the summons. What if the plaintiff does not serve them? Is the action a nullity? Would the plaintiff be in contempt?
January 31, 2012Lee Rosenberg

