A frequently disputed issue in cases involving insurance coverage for what many courts refer to as "continuous injuries," is which party ' the policyholder or its insurers ' should bear the portion of loss allocable to periods where the policyholder purchased insurance from now-insolvent carriers.
Who's doing what; who's going where.
Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
In-depth analysis of a recent case.
Clarifying a reference in the Golan v. Holder article in the November 2011 issue.
Nashville Bar Association Annual Entertainment Law in Review, Nashville, Dec. 13.
Insurance Policy Doesn't Cover Artists Suit Against Record Company
No Oral Agreement for TV Producer and Distributor to Share Revenue
Non-Payment of Foreign Record Royalties Not Enough for Rescission of Entire Contract
