Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    October 28, 2010ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Analysis of recent key rulings.

    October 28, 2010ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Over the past several years, the United Kingdom has been flexing its muscles in the global anti-corruption arena with the imposition of large penalties against companies involved in foreign-bribery offenses, focusing on individual accountability for corporate officials, close coordination with U.S. prosecutors in parallel investigations, and enforcement tools such as self-disclosures, settlements and negotiated plea agreements.

    October 28, 2010Annie Wartanian Reisinger
  • What are the implications of having child pornography on the premises? In businesses, child pornography generally is discovered by IT personnel. Or, if a corporation undergoes an unrelated internal investigation in which all computers, hard drives, e-mail servers, etc. are frozen and searched for responsive material, such a search can to lead to the discovery of child pornography stored on the corporation's server or on an individual's hard drive. What can/must/should be done as a result?

    October 28, 2010Marjorie J. Peerce and Carolyn Barth Renzin
  • In June, the Supreme Court unanimously held that Enron's former CEO Jeffrey Skilling did not commit "honest services" fraud, ruling that the statute under which he was convicted must be limited to bribery and kickback schemes to avoid constitutional concerns over vagueness. The decision should curtail prosecution of a variety of conduct that the government would otherwise seek to criminalize through the statute. In contrast, the courts are expanding the reach of other criminal statutes to encompass conduct previously regarded as outside their scope.

    October 28, 2010Stanley A. Twardy, Jr. and Doreen Klein
  • Harvard Law School Fall 2010 Entertainment Symposium
    Nashville Bar Association Annual Entertainment Law in Review

    October 28, 2010ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Evidentiary Restrictions on Proving Copyright Substantial Similarity
    Profits Accounting for Use of Band Name Is Nondischargeable Debt
    Third Amended Complaint Allowed in Karaoke Case

    October 28, 2010Stan Soocher
  • When Christopher S. Harrison first joined DMX Inc. in 2005 as vice president of business affairs, he says the new-employee paperwork required by the company was a good omen. He says he signed a waiver that he would not complain about offensive lyrics in the music playing in the office. "I knew I had made the right decision," says Harrison, now general counsel of DMX, an Austin, TX-based music provider to retailers, restaurants, hotels and other businesses. "We have music, different kinds of music, playing in pretty much everybody's office all the time," says Harrison, a fan of hip-hop and classic rock.

    October 28, 2010Jeanne Graham
  • CONCERT PROMOTION/TICKET SALES DISPUTE
    COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT/INDEPENDENT CREATION

    October 28, 2010Stan Soocher
  • Former Rutgers University star quarterback Ryan Hart got another shot at suing video game company Electronic Arts Inc., which allegedly earned billions by exploiting his persona and that of other college football stars. A federal judge in the District of New Jersey recently dismissed Hart's case but gave him 20 days to file an amended complaint to beef up one of his claims: that Electronic Art, based in Redwood City, CA, infringed on his right of publicity.

    October 28, 2010Mary Pat Gallagher