In last month's newsletter, we discussed a case in which a South Carolina plaintiff avoided dismissal of a medical malpractice case on motion for summary judgment by relying solely on the defendant medical care facility's violation of its own polices and procedures as evidence of negligence. We conclude the discussion herein.
- July 29, 2010Lee C. Weatherly
In today's climate of increasing concern about medical malpractice liability, is it safe for a doctor to give advice when asked by a treating physician?
July 29, 2010Linda S. CrawfordA Long Island, NY, judge has sentenced a woman to six weekends in jail for repeatedly undermining her ex-husband's relationship with their two daughters.
July 29, 2010Mark FassRetained testifying experts who assert that neither their findings nor their opinions might be affected by biases are either fools, liars, or lying fools.
July 29, 2010David A. MartindaleThis article describes several strategies that managing partners and administrators should consider so that firms may help improve their profitability.
July 29, 2010Joel A. RoseOn June 18, a Florida jury awarded $2.46 million to a Miami couple who claimed their house was ruined by gas emitted by imported Chinese drywall in the nation's first trial against a domestic distributor.
July 29, 2010Jose PaglieryHighlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
July 29, 2010Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and Matthew BerkowitzIf this were an article about Toyota's actions and inactions, it could stop here. But it is really about the proposed "Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010." This legislation, engendered by the Toyota recalls, makes TREAD (Transportation Recall Enhancement Accountability and Documentation Act)sem minor by comparison.
July 29, 2010Nicholas J. WittnerThere are times when a patent owner may discover that an issued patent does not claim everything that the patent should have covered. When such defects are discovered, one strategy a patent owner may wish to consider is filing a request with the USPTO for a broadened reissue of a U.S. patent to enlarge the scope of the claims of the original patent.
July 29, 2010Edward Van Gieson and Paul StellmanThe impact of Twombly and Iqbal on the pleading standard in federal motions to dismiss has been well documented during the last several years. This article examines the impact that these important cases have had when fraudulent joinder becomes an issue.
July 29, 2010Josh Becker and Jenny Mendelsohn

