Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Industry 'Custom and Practice' Not Enough to Create Binding Film Distribution Agreement

Stan Soocher

Film financing and film production can be long, slow processes. But deals for distribution rights may be struck up fast and furious, as seen from distribution interest in buzz movies at film festivals. This happened with Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire, a film about a young African-American mother in Harlem that won both the grand jury prize and audience award in drama at the Sundance Film Festival in January 2009. Hurried negotiations for the film distribution rights to Push has led to multi-suit litigation ' and a recent Manhattan federal district court ruling that may help define when there's a binding distribution deal.

Movers & Shakers

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Who's doing what; who's going where.

Features

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.

Features

Court Watch

Alexander Tuneski

Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.

Media & Communications Corner: Every Law Firm Should Be a Media Company

Nicholas Gaffney

It's time to take a leap and leave behind your firm's entrenched identity as a legal services provider: to succeed, you must start thinking of your firm as a media company.

Features

<b>Special Issue:</b> The Fifth-Anniversary MLF 50

Elizabeth Anne 'Betiayn' Tursi

At long last, marketing and communications can take center stage and become the key indicator by which law firms can measure their success ratio.

Features

IP News

Howard J. Shire & Matthew Berkowitz

Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

Features

Accepting a 2(f) Registration

Stephen W. Feingold

There are many ways that accepting a 2(f) notation can come back and haunt you once litigation has commenced.

Features

Inequitable Conduct

Gregory F. Wesner

Taking a page from the Federal Circuit's own analysis of the issue, we will examine the who, what, when, where (and why) of the decision in <i>Exergen Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</i>

Features

Is the Federal Circuit Playing with Fire?

Tammy Van Heyningen

Less than two months before the Supreme Court is scheduled to review the Federal Circuit's <i>en banc</i> decision in <i>In re Bilski</i> that found Bilski's business method claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. &sect; 101, the Federal Circuit held in <i>Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs.</i> (Fed. Cir. 2009) that claims to a diagnostic method are patent-eligible subject matter. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court's decision and held that Prometheus' personalized medicine claims satisfied the machine or transformation test set out in <i>Bilski</i>.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES