Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • BOOK PUBLISHING/PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT/SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY TEST
    RIGHT OF PUBLICITY/UNLICENSED USES

    May 29, 2009ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Malpractice Suit Continues over Manilow Musical
    Malpractice Suit/Lack of Specificity

    May 29, 2009Stan Soocher
  • A roundup of noteworthy entertainment law firm and attorney movement and news.

    May 29, 2009Compiled from Incisive Media reports
  • Valuation of a sponsorship opportunity is much more art than science and it is important that a lawyer involved in the negotiation of a sponsorship agreement understand how the various factors interrelate. While this article focuses on the factors affecting the valuation of a sponsorship opportunity with a NASCAR race team, most of the factors can be applied to sponsorship opportunities in other sports as well.

    May 29, 2009Matthew B. Efird
  • Who's doing what; who's going where.

    May 29, 2009ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent decisions have assaulted continuations on several fronts. Because of a new requirement to rescind claim scope disclaimers, it will be easier to avoid infringement of continuations, and because of strengthening enablement and written description requirements, more continuations will be invalidated on those grounds and on prior art grounds when priority claims are more easily broken. Consequently, care should be taken in the preparation and prosecution of any patent application claiming priority to another application.

    May 29, 2009Jeffrey R. Kuester
  • In re TS Tech and, to a lesser extent for patent cases, In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., have changed the landscape of ' 1404(a) cases in the Fifth Circuit. Patent cases that once would not have been transferred out of the Fifth Circuit may now be transferred based on TS Tech.

    May 29, 2009Trevor Carter and Brandon Judkins
  • Highlights of the latest intellectual property cases from around the country.

    May 29, 2009Howard J. Shire and Brian J. Beck
  • Recent decisions have begun to fill in the gaps left by In re Seagate Technology, LLC. They suggest that a competent opinion is still an effective defense to a willfulness charge, and that a jury may consider a defendant's failure to obtain an opinion when determining the defendant's intent for purposes of willfulness and inducement. Also, legitimate trial defenses may be sufficient to establish that a defendant's actions at the time of infringement were not "objectively reckless.

    May 29, 2009Bruce Barker and Frederick Hadidi
  • Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.

    May 28, 2009ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |