Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • This edition of the Quarterly State Compliance Review looks at some legislation of interest to corporate lawyers that went into effect recently, including amendments to the corporation laws of Delaware, California, and New York. This edition also includes two recent decisions of interest from the Delaware Chancery Court.

    September 26, 2008Sandra Feldman
  • Everything contained in this issue, in an easy-to-read format.

    September 26, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • What obligations does a buyer's broker have to different clients interested in purchasing the same property? When faced with that question in Rivkin v. Century 21 Teran Realty LLC, the Second Circuit certified the question to the New York Court of Appeals. Rivkin answered at least one significant question surrounding the obligations of a buyer's broker, but the Court of Appeals opinion raised new questions whose resolution will await future litigation (or legislation).

    September 26, 2008Stewart E. Sterk
  • A look at recent rulings of importance.

    September 26, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The Second Circuit recently issued an important decision in Teamsters Local 445 Freight Div. Pension Fund v. Dynex Capital Inc., which has significant implications for securities class action litigation and the continuing fallout from the crisis in the credit markets. The decision addressed the issue of collective scienter, or whether a corporation can commit securities fraud when none of its individual agents acted with fraudulent intent.

    September 26, 2008Edward J. Fuhr, Terence J. Rasmussen, and Steven M. Haas
  • Analysis of recent rulings.

    September 26, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Commentary on the latest cases.

    September 26, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

    September 24, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • A consenting romantic or sexual relationship between two employees, and especially between a manager/supervisor and an employee, may lead to complications, difficulties and legal problems for all concerned ' the employees, the manager/supervisor and the company. Hence the "love contract."

    September 24, 2008Barbara Reeves Neal