In-depth analysis of recent rulings.
- May 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
All companies must live with the risks and uncertainties inherent in their businesses. Doing business with Chinese manufacturers, however, recently has proven to be more risky than some companies had anticipated.
May 27, 2008Jonathan M. Cohen, Stephen A. Weisbrod, and Kami E. QuinnCorporate scandals over the past decade have led to an encyclopedia of new statutes, regulations, initiatives, and programs, at the state, federal, and global levels. Corporations have responded with new or revised ethics codes and rules governing business conduct. Along with this mass of law, corporations have been expected to police themselves through stringent compliance and reporting programs. The current business cycle may make compliance efforts even more difficult.
May 27, 2008Beth L. Fancsali and Paul OlszowkaThe continuing economic crisis, driven in large measure by the subprime mortgage meltdown, is affecting major segments of the economy. Not a day goes by that there is not something in the press regarding the effects of billions of dollars of mortgage failures. Criminal investigations into all industries involved in the process are underway. The Department of Justice is considering creating a task force, much in the same way the Bush Administration created the Corporate Fraud Task Force in the aftermath of the Enron failure.
May 27, 2008Charles A. RossThis is the second in a series of articles discussing how in-house counsel can better manage litigation matters.
May 27, 2008Stewart M. WeltmanIn a closely watched case arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ('ERISA'), the U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the right of employees to sue plan fiduciaries for mismanaging their individual 401(k) accounts. LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 467, 42 EBC 2857 (2008)
May 27, 2008Michael S. Melbinger and Steve FloresOn April 5, 2007, the Court of Appeals voided a decade-old court-ordered stipulation that had settled a contested litigation over a rent-stabilized apartment. The landlord in Riverside Syndicate Inc. v. Munroe, et al. 10 N.Y.3d 18, was allowed to renege on a settlement on the theory that the stipulation violated public policy and unlawfully waived the tenant's rights. The ramifications of this ruling are extraordinary. A party to a court ordered settlement can reap the benefits for as long as is opportune (the court ruled that there is no applicable statute of limitations).
May 27, 2008Darryl VernonBefore committing to membership in a mixed-use community, potential tenants should carefully review the terms contained in the community's declaration of protective covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements. This article enumerates significant considerations that should be examined when reviewing the declarations.
May 27, 2008Nadine Sophia EvansRecent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
May 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

