Who's going where; who's doing what.
- March 28, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
March 28, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |New Jersey's year-old Civil Union Act has failed so far to convey to registered same-sex couples the rights and privileges of marriage, a state commission reported on Feb. 18.
March 28, 2008Charles ToutantHighlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
March 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Three decisions ' Fortis Benefits v. Cantu,; Mid-Continent Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.,; and Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Frank's Crew & Rental Tools, Inc. ' appear to reflect the Texas Supreme Court's view that courts applying Texas law should not read more into policies than what is expressly included. And, if there is an agreement apart from the insurance contract, the Texas Supreme Court will look for it to be in writing.
March 27, 2008Sheila R. Caudle and Tyler HenkelAn Illinois appellate court recently held that a subcontractor's insurer wrongfully rejected a general contractor's tender of defense for a suit filed by the subcontractor's employee. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. v. Habitat Constr. Co.
March 27, 2008Bruce LichtcsienA captive is a privately held insurance company, and it can be a subsidiary of the insured business. It issues policies, collects premiums and pays claims, just like a commercial insurer; however, it does not offer insurance to the public. Developing and initiating a captive program may not be suitable for all companies, but by employing the tactics outlined in this article, you can make the decision that best suits your company's needs.
March 27, 2008Bruce MolnarThe law is clear in many jurisdictions that insureds typically are entitled to discover information about reserves. Lipton v. Superior Court is one of the leading cases.
March 27, 2008Kirk A. PasichIn December 2007, Lucent Technologies Inc. secured a non-prosecution agreement from the Department of Justice and settled an enforcement action with the SEC for conduct related to travel and entertainment expenses incurred on behalf of Chinese government officials and for the manner in which these expenses were booked. The Lucent settlement adds to a number of existing guideposts regarding permissible interactions with foreign officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. This article examines the Lucent settlement, prior FCPA enforcement activity related to travel and lodging, and offers some practical advice for compliance counsel.
March 27, 2008David S. Krakoff and James T. ParkinsonTurning over the reins of a law firm is an art form. A well-staged plan that allows for a seamless transition from current leaders to the next generation — in both client relationships and management responsibilities — is crucial to the health and longevity of your partnership.
March 27, 2008Phillip A. Bottari

