Last month, we discussed the fact that a recent decision by the California Court of Appeal explores the relationship between the doctrine of informed consent and the intentional tort of battery. The case was Saxena v Goffney. This is the conclusion of that discussion.
Federal government attorneys recently unsuccessfully attempted to convince a Federal District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to rewrite the terms of the Federal Tort Claims Act ('FTCA') to allow the creation of a reversionary trust rather than give a lump-sum award to pay for a medical malpractice plaintiff's future medical expenses.
Who's going where; who's doing what.
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
New Jersey's year-old Civil Union Act has failed so far to convey to registered same-sex couples the rights and privileges of marriage, a state commission reported on Feb. 18.
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
Three decisions ' Fortis Benefits v. Cantu,; Mid-Continent Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.,; and Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Frank's Crew & Rental Tools, Inc. ' appear to reflect the Texas Supreme Court's view that courts applying Texas law should not read more into policies than what is expressly included. And, if there is an agreement apart from the insurance contract, the Texas Supreme Court will look for it to be in writing.
An Illinois appellate court recently held that a subcontractor's insurer wrongfully rejected a general contractor's tender of defense for a suit filed by the subcontractor's employee. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. v. Habitat Constr. Co.
A captive is a privately held insurance company, and it can be a subsidiary of the insured business. It issues policies, collects premiums and pays claims, just like a commercial insurer; however, it does not offer insurance to the public. Developing and initiating a captive program may not be suitable for all companies, but by employing the tactics outlined in this article, you can make the decision that best suits your company's needs.
The law is clear in many jurisdictions that insureds typically are entitled to discover information about reserves. Lipton v. Superior Court is one of the leading cases.
