Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Limited Scope of Arbitration: A Basis for Removing Claims Subject to Rescission Actions Image

The Limited Scope of Arbitration: A Basis for Removing Claims Subject to Rescission Actions

Anthony J. Golowski II

Automobile insurance carriers in New Jersey and New York are routinely faced with the issue of whether a fraudulent insurance claim for personal injury protection ('PIP') benefits must be adjudicated in statutorily mandated PIP arbitration or whether those claims may be adjudicated in a court of law. In cases involving fraudulently procured insurance policies, this issue was squarely decided on July 27, 2007 by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court in <i>Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Fiouris</i>.

The Applicability of the Absolute Pollution Exclusion to Welding Fumes Claims Image

The Applicability of the Absolute Pollution Exclusion to Welding Fumes Claims

Jennifer R. Devery & Margot L. Green

Litigants and courts are struggling with whether the polution exclusion encompasses "non-traditional" claims that, on their face, would appear to fall within the exclusion's definitions, <i>e.g.</i>, lead paint, carbon monoxide poisoning, and other toxic exposure claims. This article first describes the split among the courts on this issue and then looks at the question in the specific sub-context of welding fumes claims.

Features

The Obviousness of Patent Alternatives Image

The Obviousness of Patent Alternatives

Thomas J. Colson

This article explores the alternatives to patenting.

Supreme Court to Reconsider Patent Exhaustion Image

Supreme Court to Reconsider Patent Exhaustion

Paul A. Ragusa & Noera Ayaz

May a patent owner sue its own licensee's customers when those customers purchase essential components that have no reasonable non-infringing use from the licensee, and then combine those components with others to form a patented product? The answer may be decided by the Supreme Court in <i>Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.,</i> U.S., No. 06-937, <i>cert. granted</i> Sept. 25, 2007.

Features

USPTO Implements New Rules Governing Continuing Applications and Claim Quantities Image

USPTO Implements New Rules Governing Continuing Applications and Claim Quantities

Andrew T. Spence, James T. Pinyerd & Guy R. Gosnell

The second installment of this two-part series examines the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's final rule as it relates to examination of claims, applications with patentably-indistinct claims, second-action final practice, and refund of excess-claim fees.

Transgender Employees Image

Transgender Employees

John D. Shyer & Toshi Kameoka

Part one of this article explained the terminology and discussed some of the challenges employers face in treating transgender employees in a nondiscriminatory manner. Part Two continues the discussion.

Voluntary Versus Mandatory Wellness Programs Image

Voluntary Versus Mandatory Wellness Programs

David S. Baffa

With the understanding that preventable illnesses means preventable costs, many employers have instituted programs aimed at improving employees' overall physical and mental health. These strategies are commonly referred to as 'wellness programs.' This article examines the types of wellness programs that have been used with increasing frequency, as well as the benefits and risks associated with those programs.

Florida's New Domestic Violence Leave Law Image

Florida's New Domestic Violence Leave Law

Mark A. Addington

On July 1, 2007, Florida became one a handful of states that require employers to provide leave to employees to deal with domestic violence. The new law creates ' 741.313, Florida Statutes, requiring certain employers with 50 or more employees to provide leave for employees to deal with domestic violence issues.

Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Non-Disclosure Agreements Image

Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Non-Disclosure Agreements

Rosanna Sattler & Joseph P. Corrigan

When negotiating non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreements, there are many issues that should be taken into consideration, regardless of whether counsel is given to the employer or employee. For example, is the agreement or restrictive covenant necessary to protect the employer's legitimate business interests? Is the agreement supported by adequate consideration? Is the restrictive covenant reasonably limited as to time and geographical location in which the conduct is prohibited? What law will apply to the agreement?

Features

IP News Image

IP News

Matt Berkowitz

Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Law Firms and the Rise of Hospitality
    The law firm office cannot remain unchanged, as if frozen in time set to some date prior to the onset of pandemic, when the terms and meaning have all changed. In fact, the office must now provide benefits or an experience the lawyers and staff cannot get at home.
    Read More ›
  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›
  • Lack of Logo Placement At Center of Ruling Over Meat Loaf Album Packaging
    To build visibility for its brand, a record label or production company will want its logo included on products containing its master recordings manufactured and distributed by third parties. This will be addressed in the agreement between the label or production company and manufacturer/distributor. The failure to include the logo may raise a host of issues, from the breadth of the logo-placement obligation ' such as whether it includes Internet downloads ' to the proper theory on which to base any damages and just which album-sales figures are subject to evidentiary discovery. A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ' in a long-running dispute between Cleveland International Records and Sony Music Entertainment ' illustrated how these issues may be argued and decided.
    Read More ›