Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • The U.S. Department of Labor says most companies that experience a major disaster are out of business within five years, because only 25% of companies have a disaster plan. This article provides guidance as to how your law firm can plan for disaster.

    January 30, 2008Ed Poll
  • This article describes several strategies that a managing partner should consider when developing a plan to survive a recession.

    January 30, 2008Joel A. Rose
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    January 30, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Matrimonial attorneys are all familiar with the concept of minority interests in closely held businesses, but there is not that much litigation in divorce cases concerning real estate, in which a litigating party owns less than a 50% share. Often, the same valuation theories that apply to corporations apply to real estate interests. Moreover, a creative use of those theories can help your client greatly.

    January 30, 2008Paul L. Feinstein
  • In this article on peer review, the authors hope to create for the reader a healthy skepticism about the process, and shed light on assumptions that they believe are often made by colleagues, attorneys and judges about the academic rigor and scientific integrity of the endeavor.

    January 30, 2008David A. Martindale and Jonathan Gould
  • There is a sense of finality when the dissolution decree is entered with the court. Those who practice a steady diet of family law realize, however, that entry of the decree means the divorce process is over for the client, but the attorney is not yet done with the case.

    January 30, 2008Laura Sell and Janay Fergusson
  • Who's doing what; who's going where.

    January 29, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

    January 29, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The latest happenings you need to know.

    January 29, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Medical battery is generally defined as a touching that the patient has not consented to. This occurs when the care provider steps far outside the agreed-upon scope of treatment or, more infrequently, omits to obtain any consent to treatment at all. The New Jersey Supreme Court defined the concept in Perna v. Pirozzi: 'If the claim is characterized as a failure to obtain informed consent, the operation may constitute an act of medical malpractice; if, however, it is viewed as a failure to obtain any consent, it is better classified as a battery.'

    January 29, 2008Janice G. Inman