LJN Newsletters

In the good old days, security concerns of tenants could generally be laid to rest simply by recourse to a good locksmith. In those simpler times, and without any association with security matters, landlords and property managers routinely gathered from tenants social security numbers and other information for purposes of protecting the landlord's interests when it came to tracking down miscreant tenants. Because this type of information was not subject to the widening panoply of privacy-related laws that are now becoming ubiquitous across the United States, no special arrangements were typically considered necessary to protect this information, and there was no particular risk or burden imposed on its holder. How things have changed. Nowadays, holding this type of information can constitute a double-edged sword, with any slip carrying with it the possibility of harm to the wielding hand.

A co-tenancy requirement may have substantial negative effects, including a domino effect if more than one tenant ceases to operate. Most landlords resist giving such rights to a tenant, especially an in-line tenant. However, if an important tenant has sufficient negotiating leverage, a landlord may be forced to roll the dice, agree to a co-tenancy requirement, and hope that the designated co-tenant will continue to operate during the term of the benefited tenant's lease. This article focuses on ways a landlord can limit the impact of co-tenancy requirements.

Operating leases are becoming increasingly important to many corporate lessees for a variety of reasons. The primary reason a corporate lessee prefers operating leases to capital leases is for balance sheet management reasons. Operating leases, or 'true leases' — as opposed to capital leases — reduce the lessee's outstanding debt recorded on the balance sheet, which results in a better debt-to-equity ratio. The other motivations behind the corporate lessee's preference for operating lease treatment vary. For example, many corporate credit facilities have covenants preventing corporations from creating debt, which usually includes capital leases. Also, many companies want to preserve current lines of credit and cash for other ventures, such as the acquisition of a new business line.

News about lawyers and law firms in the product liability field.

Highlights of the latest product liability cases from around the country.

For years, Hersh & Hersh ('H&H') has represented hundreds of users of a top-selling anti-psychotic drug in suits against its maker. Now the firm is taking on bigger clients against the same company: states that say they've been footing the public health costs from the drug. H&H's first such client against pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly & Co. is the state of New Mexico, which claims it spent about $18 million on Zyprexa'-related medical expenses between 1999 and 2005.

This article discusses two interesting developments in recently published decisions. The Gorran case involves litigation over allegedly harmful consequences of following the well-known 'Atkins' Diet.' As will be seen, an attempt to structure the claim within product liability doctrine posed a big challenge. The Blockbuster decision answers a key question in light of new federal legislation, popularly called 'CAFA' (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005), which was intended to enhance removal of certain class actions from state to federal courts. The question is, who has the burden of proving CAFA's jurisdictional requirements: the defendant trying to stay in federal court or the plaintiff trying to send the case back to state court?

Depending on the source cited, California's expanding economy ranks in size, worldwide, anywhere between six and 10, if California were a country in and of itself. (www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/economyofCalifornia#endnote_worldranking) California's position as a stand-alone economy may be matched as a stand-alone jurisdiction if recent appellate and trial court decisions permitting the expansion of the product liability theory to claims of environmental damage are upheld.