Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.
Features
As retailers like to say, 'The three most important factors in retailing are location, location, location.' The real value of a retail lease, however, resides in the volume of sales produced at the location; therefore, the provider of the location — namely, the landlord — is a key player in the retailer's success. That is why percentage rent has developed in retail leases as a way by which the landlord that provides a successful location might share to some degree in that success.
Features
Part One of this series explored the reasons why landlords should be concerned about silicosis litigation. This conclusion suggests some measures that landlords can take to avoid ' or at least reduce ' such litigation.
Features
The first impression one may have when preparing to draft an early termination agreement is that such a document should be a simple matter. It is true that simplicity and brevity in drafting are, in most circumstances, admirable qualities, and it is equally true that we frequently draft and negotiate documents that are much more complex than most lease termination agreements. Nevertheless, as with any effort to document a transaction, care must be taken in the preparation and negotiation of such an agreement to avoid overlooking potential risks and to protect the client's interests. This article explores some considerations in documenting the early termination of a lease, though not necessarily in order of importance. Although some specific suggestions are made and some sample provisions are included, the primary intent of this discussion is to alert the leasing practitioner to various issues and pitfalls that may be encountered.
Features
Understandably, companies have become more sensitive about protecting confidential, proprietary business information from disclosure to competitors and others outside the company.<br>A recent ruling by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, <i>Venetian Casino Report v. EEOC</i>, 2006 WL 2806568 (D.D. Cir. 2006), demonstrates that such disclosures may occur in the most unexpected ways.
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Just as the business community began making headway with Congress to reduce Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) obligations, a new type of corporate wrongdoing has been revealed ' backdated stock options used by the executives at many companies and some directors to convert their options at the most opportune times and at the expense of other shareholders and investors. What is troubling is how the boards of directors at so many companies could have approved the backdating or not known about it after SOX and the recent wave of high-profile corporate fraud investigations and prosecutions.
Today, a Procrustean 'one-size-fits-all' approach increasingly characterizes federal appellate practice, particularly for attorneys who handle complex conspiracy or white-collar cases. While page limits for appellate briefs date back to at least the 1940s, within the past 20 years they have been applied with a new and sometimes surprising inflexibility. No matter how long the trial, how complicated its facts, or how numerous the appellate issues may be, the day has passed when counsel can assume that requests to file a brief in excess of the standard word limits will be granted.
Features
In the post-Enron world, many public companies have come under intense scrutiny from the government. A diverse chorus of critics argues that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has gone too far, citing the overzealousness of line-level prosecutors, their failure to adhere to the measured tone struck by higher-level officials in their public pronouncements, and their general tendency to treat companies as racketeering organizations.
