Features

Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.

Features

Today, most large tenants and many small tenants require that their core business be protected in a power or community shopping center by obtaining an agreement from the landlord that grants the tenant the exclusive right to sell the items considered by that tenant to be its core business. This 'exclusive' is considered sacrosanct by most retailers and, in most circumstances, will need to be agreed to by a landlord in order to consummate a lease with that tenant.

Features

Several issues or potential issues arise when addressing the presence of vertical and horizontal transportation within the common areas of an enclosed regional shopping center. The first part of this article discussed accessibility and visibility. The conclusion addresses relocation or closure of the transportation, and changing the means of transportation. Sample provisions are provided.

Let's be honest. How many of us really read the insurance section of a lease? Now let's be really, really honest: Who understands what that section means?

When landlords and tenants are engaged in the negotiation and drafting of a lease, all too often, their attention is focused on those matters that are the first to occur. As a result, too little attention is paid to the issues surrounding the return of the premises when the lease term expires. Obviously, the business terms of the transaction such as rent, operating costs, and construction allowances all must be identified before a deal can be reached. Furthermore, those matters that have a direct impact on the tenant's occupancy and use of the premises are of clear importance to the parties from an operational standpoint. However, when the landlord and tenant fail to give the same level of consideration to the expiration of the lease term that is given to the commencement of the term, problems can arise.

Recent cases in e-commerce law and in the e-commerce industry.

Features

Generally, a joint return must be signed by both spouses to be considered as such. Since there may be substantial savings by filing a joint return over filing under the married, separate rates, if one spouse refuses to sign a joint return, can or should the divorce court require the recalcitrant spouse to do so? Many trial judges require the spouse to sign the return, or at least threaten to, but is it proper?

Reversing both a Northampton County, PA, trial court and a three-judge panel of the Superior Court, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled unanimously ' in a case of first impression ' that the adult daughter of a failed marriage should not be able to sue her father to enforce a child support provision from her parents' property settlement agreement that would benefit her directly. <i>Chen v. Chen</i>, No. 89 MAP 2004, March 20, 2006.