Employers frequently enter into employment agreements with their employees for a fixed period of time at a stated annual salary. What happens if, at the end of such an agreement's term, both parties continue to perform under the expired employment agreement as if the agreement were still in effect?

Features

When someone becomes an equity partner in a law firm, he or she becomes an owner of an institution that has a substantial value ' certainly greater value than is demonstrated on a cash basis balance sheet. Yet the majority of U.S. law firms admit partners with little or no requirement that they make a purchase of the firm's capital assets.

Companywide layoffs don't immunize an employer from age discrimination suits The Third Circuit has ruled that where an employee is able to demonstrate 'implausibilities and inconsistencies' in an employer's justification for his or her layoff, the employer is not entitled to summary judgment in an age discrimination suit, even if the plaintiff's layoff resulted from an overall reduction in force (RIF) and the employer was able to identify certain 'age neutral' determination criteria. Tomasso v. The…

When Judge Scheindlin ruled in a landmark case and made the statement 'that's going to be the most expensive curse word you ever said,' little did she realize the prophetic nature of her words. I am not sure whether Judge Scheindlin knew how 'codified' her electronic discovery rulings would become when she issued her opinions (five times, no less in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg). She probably could not have foreseen the resulting cost and risk impact on corporations faced with defending lawsuits containing (as part of the pool of potential evidence) large volumes of electronically stored information (ESI). <br>We are now at the brink of the 'codification.' The (amended) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (where the Zubulake standards are extremely influential) governing electronic discovery will go into effect in December 2006.

Features

The United States Supreme Court's recent decision in <i>Illinois Tools Works v. Independent Ink</i> reversed almost 50 years of precedent holding that the owner of a patent was presumed to have market power in patent-related tying cases brought under the Sherman Act. The Court noted that Congressional amendments to the patent code explicitly finding that tying was not a per se patent misuse, coupled by the widely accepted view in academia that patents did not inherently lead to market power, had so eroded the legal doctrine supporting the presumption of market power in patent-related tying cases, that a new rule was appropriate. The Court held that in all future tying cases, the plaintiff must allege and prove that the defendant has actual market power in the tying product ' the mere existence of a patent is no longer sufficient.

Features

Over the last decade, one of the major trends in this country has been the privatization of services by governments. The federal government has increasingly ' with the approval of Congress ' contracted out to private entities functions that historically had been performed only by governments themselves.<br>This privatization of federal services has spawned a variety of legal issues. One of the most significant is whether employees of these private entities can be sued for monetary damages, in the same fashion that public employees can be sued, by people who assert that these employees violated their constitutional rights. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently shed light on this issue in the case of <i>Holly v. Scott</i>.

Features

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published its proposal to revamp the rules governing the disclosure of executive and director compensation on Jan. 27, 2006. The proposed rules stand to significantly alter the compensation disclosure requirements applicable to registration statements, proxy statements, annual reports and Form 8-Ks, and are intended to ensure that investors receive disclosure that is 'clearer and more complete.' The regulations are the first attempt at a major overhaul of compensation disclosure since 1992 and were proposed in response to the widespread criticism that the current disclosure requirements do not engender a complete and accurate description of executive pay packages. <br>The proposal, to adapt the old saying, combines something old, something new and something borrowed.

Features

Many of the stories about senior partners pressured to retire so the next generation can take over are not pretty. They contradict long-held notions of what a partnership should be and neglect the long-time partners' non-financial needs.For younger generations in the workplace to get what they want from a transitioning agreement, there must be something in it for the more senior people too.