Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Features
New York has recently been exposed to a resurgence of doubt regarding the usefulness of evaluations performed by mental health professionals (MHPs) in custody matters. In debates certain to affect the national family law community, the criticism questions the scientific validity of recommendations and observations that these professionals are called upon to make, asking whether the experts, in fact, have the expertise to participate meaningfully in the process. This article responds to some of the criticism by seeking to clarify the role that MHPs play.
Features
Because the custody evaluator comes to court as an expert witness, he or she may be impeached by the published writings of other professionals in his or her field. <i>People v. Feldman</i>, 299 NY 153, 85 NE2d 913 (1949). Once a proper foundation is laid, passages that contradict the testimony may be read and the witness asked whether he or she agrees or disagrees with those statements. When used in such fashion, the content of the statement put to the witness does not become evidence in the case, but is allowed only to discredit or weaken his or her testimony by showing that learned writers in the field have expressed contrary views. This article uses New York rules of procedure to explore the evidentiary doctrine and trial techniques pertaining to impeachment by treatise when confronting the testimony of a custody evaluator.
Recent developments of note in the Internet industry. This month:<br>CA Judge Orders Online Reporters to Reveal Sources in Apple Computer Case<br>Hollywood Studios File New Round of Web Lawsuits <br>British Court Forces ISPs to Reveal Music Sharers <br>Movie Downloading Judged Legal in France <br>eBay Loses Patent Case; Injunction May Follow
The cyber-crusaders behind the attempt to roll back the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act are at it again. <br>This time, Stanford professor Lawrence Lessig and his Cyberlaw Clinic asked a Northern California district court to strike the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992, which automatically renewed so-called orphan works, copyrights in works created from 1964-1977. Not one to shy away from controversy, the Clinic also asked the district court to reconsider the Supreme Court's Eldred decision in light of the "fundamental" changes Congress made to the U.S. copyright system over the last 30 years. Although the Clinic made some interesting policy arguments, it once again failed to articulate a sound legal basis to back up its claims.
Features
Can hyperlinks on one Web site that link to another site where copyrighted materials are displayed constitute copyright infringement? Although at least two earlier decisions have declined to recognize the potential of copyright infringement from the mere use of such hyperlinks, the recent Indiana federal district court case, <i>Batesville Services, Inc v. Funeral Depot, Inc.</i>, concluded that a defendant's use of hyperlinks on a Web site that link to copyrighted material on another Web site could constitute copyright infringement.
Features
Following the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, disclosures by public companies via their Web sites are increasingly required or encouraged. With the implementation of these new rules and the growth of the Internet, investors, as well as prospective investors, increasingly are relying upon a company's Web site for investment information. Public companies should recognize the value of their Web sites as marketing and investor-relations tools, subject to the boundaries of applicable legal standards and constraints.
Features
Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Features
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Features
It seems fitting to recall Samuel Morse's first telegraph message now that his telecommunications progeny Bernie Ebbers, former chief executive of WorldCom, has been convicted on all nine counts claiming that he helped mastermind an $11 billion accounting fraud at his former firm, now known as MCI. Ebbers had been charged with one count of conspiracy, one count of securities fraud, and seven counts of filing false statements with securities regulators. He could serve up to 85 years in prison. Meanwhile, another senior executive of a major corporation has been undone -- not by business fraud, but by a personal affair.
Features
In February, President Bush signed his first piece of "tort reform" legislation, the Class Action Fairness Act (the Act), into law. The Act expands federal diversity jurisdiction to encompass most large class actions, including employment law related class actions. One area of employment litigation that the Act may likely impact is in the wage and hour class action context where, as discussed below, litigants file wage and hour class actions in state court while also pursuing Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective actions in federal court.