Paul L. Feinstein
It has become important to keep track of national trends with respect to the definition of income for support purposes. More often than not, your state will not have decided the specific question with which you are struggling, ie, whether or not a particular item constitutes income. The odds are increasing that other states will have dealt with the issue. This article presents some examples of cases over the last few years.
By Steven Goldberg
Effective July 1, 2004, the Delaware General Assembly adopted significant amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, and the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act as part of its periodic amendments to these Acts for the purpose of keeping them current and maintaining their preeminence among U.S. business laws. <br>This article summarizes the most pertinent of those changes.
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
Features
Dana Scott Fried
The American Jobs Creation Act (the "Act") was passed by the House of Representatives on Oct. 7, 2004, and received final approval from the Senate on Oct. 11, 2004. President Bush was expected to sign the Act into law before the end of 2004. The Act enumerates an array of requirements intended to curb perceived abuses in the realm of executive compensation. In many ways, the thrust of the new requirements is to conform a number of aspects of the operation of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements to those applicable to tax-qualified "401(k)" plans. Consequently, to be tax-effective under the new requirements of the Act, deferred compensation arrangements will need to operate in a fashion more akin to true retirement arrangements.
Philip M. Berkowitz
Employment lawyers have been inundated in the last few weeks with calls from clients asking how and whether the new American Jobs Creation Act affects various severance pay plans and other deferred compensation plans. If you are still recovering from the recent presidential election, or are preoccupied by the pending elections in Iraq, this one may have slipped by you. The smart thing to do would be to consult your benefits partner, as I did. In this article, I explain this new law in layman's terms and help you respond to those callers clamoring for information about this creatively titled statute.
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
National rulings you need to know.
Features
Daniel Wise
Slightly more than 2% of the lawyers at 23 of New York City's largest firms identify themselves as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, according to a New York County Lawyers' Association survey. The survey, the first of its kind, also found that the participating firms prohibit discrimination against employees because of their sexual orientation or identity. Those firms also uniformly reported extending family benefits coverage they provide to married couples to same-sex couples registered with the city as domestic partners.
Larry D. Soderquist
On January 12 the Supreme Court, in <i>United States v. Booker</i>, found portions of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines unconstitutional. For the last few years corporate officers and directors have been forced to take a personal interest in criminal justice and in the Sentencing Guidelines. This has been especially true after the United States Sentencing Commission raised the guideline's penalties for white-collar crime in response to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
John A. Nixon
&
Erik T. Hoover
Recent corporate scandals have cast a harsh light on executive compensation practices ' including deferred compensation plans benefiting officers, directors and high-level executives. As part of the American Jobs Creation Act signed by President Bush on Oct. 22, 2004, Congress added Section 409A to the Internal Revenue Code. Section 409A imposes numerous restrictions on non-qualified deferred compensation plans (NQDCs) and will introduce a new compliance regime in the executive compensation arena.
Features
Joel N. Bock
In the business world, risks are commonplace and an inherent part of doing business. The goal of any business, however, is to minimize the risks that it faces ' in the most efficient manner, using the minimum amount of resources. One of the keys to running an efficient and effective business is knowing how to manage risks in the context of the overall business strategy. In the IP arena, risks management is also possible, and it begins with the IP Audit.
