Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • The Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled that the president of the Nevada-based Legends In Concert owed no fiduciary duty to a corporation formed by an entrepreneur to raise the capital needed to produce a Legends musical in Myrtle Beach.

    April 29, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

    April 29, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Malicious Prosecution/Anti-SLAPP Motion

    April 29, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent developments in entertainment law.

    April 29, 2005Stan Soocher
  • This occasional column will cover court rulings on sports-related issues of interest to the entertainment industry.

    April 29, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent cases in entertainment law.

    April 29, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • WASHINGTON, DC ' The controversy over whether developers and distributors of peer-to-peer file-sharing software should be found liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement has been described as the most important copyright case for the entertainment industry in two decades ' or as an issue that Congress ultimately will decide. (That the underlying unlicensed downloading and uploading of entertainment content by consumers is direct infringement has already been made clear by courts.) To this observer in the court's press section, questioning by the U.S. Supreme Court justices during the recent oral arguments in what is known as the Grokster case demonstrated no clear consensus among the justices.

    April 29, 2005Stan Soocher
  • A complete list of everything contained in this issue.

    April 28, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

    April 28, 2005ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |