No Removal of Children Who Witness Abuse
New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, recently issued a ground-breaking opinion, holding that a battered woman's failure to prevent her children from witnessing her own abuse does not automatically give protective agencies license to remove the child. <i>Nicholson v. Scoppetta</i>, 113, Oct. 26, 2004.
Features
How To Empower Your Client
Most divorce clients initially feel "powerless" about the events of their lives and their potential divorce litigation. With some creativity, attorneys can encourage their clients to take affirmative steps from the onset, and permit them to feel proactive instead of reactive to the circumstances in which they find themselves. This initial interview with a client carries significant weight and sets the tone for the attorney-client relationship. Attorneys can impress a potential client with their experience in dealing with these issues and solidify the client's trust in their expertise. The creation of trust in the relationship must occur. To accomplish this goal, the attorney must listen to the potential client's facts. Depending on the circumstances, the attorney analyzes the information presented, counsels the client on what facts are important to prove the case and informs the individual how to obtain them. The "empowered client" now has a sense of direction and actually may uncover significant information that might resolve or alter the final result of the case.
Psychological Assessment: Evaluating the Evaluations
In an article scheduled for publication in the April, 2005 edition of the <i>Journal of Child Custody</i> (in press), Gould-Saltman, an experienced family law attorney, opines that attorneys like tests because they "break things down to numbers, and we understand numbers." She adds: "Tests give the sense [emphasis added] of objectivity to counterbalance the much more subjective clinical portion of a custody evaluation." In commenting on the MMPI-2 in particular, Gould-Saltman expresses the view that it is "probably the most well-liked test among lawyers because it offers 'hard numbers' rather than ephemeral concepts." If only it were this simple.
Features
Leveraging Specialty Libraries
Like many firms, our law library collection and the prime real estate space it consumed at our offices in Chicago were realistic targets for cost-cutting consideration. The challenge for many law librarians has been to reduce costs while still ensuring their firms' attorneys and research staff have access to the right information they need when they need it.
Peachtree Software Review
Peachtree software has been on the market for more than 25 years, and while in recent times it has played second string to QuickBooks, it doesn't have to anymore. Since this product line was acquired by Best Software, the maker of Timeslips, Peachtree has been transformed from the ugly duckling to the beautiful swan.
Features
Chronology Best Practices
A fact chronology can be a tremendous asset as you prepare a case for trial. Yet, the majority of chronologies fail to live up to their full potential. Here are some simple steps that will help you get the most out of yours.
Features
Practice Tip: 'It's NOT Electronic Paper'
As the courts and clients struggle with the growing complexities of electronic information, the federal judiciary has begun exploring proposals aimed at addressing the challenges of electronic discovery. While several of the current federal proposals are still open for comment, it is worth taking a moment to consider the fundamental properties of electronic data and how conventional thoughts on evidence do or do not apply. As comforting as it would be to think of electronic evidence as just digital paper, the reality is that there are some inherent properties of electronic evidence that make it fundamentally different from conventional evidence.
Challenges And Adjustments In A Merger
There is a drama that is acted out every day on the stages of hundreds of law firms throughout the world. Firm A, which may have been a local, regional or even national firm, has recently merged into (read "acquired by") Firm B, a larger national or international firm, and the partners from Firm A are adjusting to being part of such a huge firm. <br>There are many pluses to becoming part of a much larger firm ' but there are also many differences and challenges. If the merger is to be successful, the partners in Firm A must anticipate the differences and challenges and Firm B must recognize them.
Features
Around the Firms
London firm DLA and the partners of Piper Rudnick started off December with a vote to merge the two firms, and thus the New Year brings about the world's third-largest law firm measured by lawyers ' and fifth-largest measured by revenues.
Making Merged Firms Work As One
Finding a merger candidate can be a daunting process. However, integrating a merged group of attorneys into a "new" firm's culture, practice environment and organizational structure so that attorneys from both firms work as one may be a greater challenge.
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.
MOST POPULAR STORIES
- Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination SuitsIn recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.Read More ›
- 'Insurable Interest' and the Scope of First-Party CoverageThis article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.Read More ›
- The Flight to Quality and Workplace ExperienceThat the pace of change is "accelerating" is surely an understatement. What seemed almost a near certainty a year ago — that law firms would fully and permanently embrace work-from-home — is experiencing a seeming reversal. While many firms have, in fact, embraced hybrid operations, the meaning of hybrid has evolved from "office optional," to an average required 2 days a week, to now many firms coming out with four-day work week mandates — this time, with teeth.Read More ›
- AI or Not To AI: Observations from Legalweek NY 2023This year at Legalweek, there was little doubt on what the annual takeaway topic would be. As much as I tried to avoid it for fear of beating the proverbial dead horse, it was impossible not to talk about generative AI, ChatGPT, and all that goes with it. Some fascinating discussions were had and many aspects of AI were uncovered.Read More ›
- The Powerful Impact of The Non-Foreclosure Notice of PendencyRPAPL ' 1331 and RPAPL ' 1403 Notices of Pendency are requisite elements for foreclosing a mortgage. <i>See, Chiarelli v. Kotsifos</i>, 5 A.D.3d 345 (a notice of pendency is a prerequisite to obtaining a judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action); <i>Campbell v. Smith</i>, 309 A.D.2d 581, 582 (a notice of pendency is required in a foreclosure action under RPAPL Article 13). In contrast, an ex parte CPLR Article 65 Notice of Pendency (the "Notice") is not required but it is a significant tool in an action claiming title to, or an interest in or the use or enjoyment of, another's land. The filer does not have to make a meritorious showing or post a bond. Article 65 provides mechanisms for the defendant-owner to vacate the Notice that caused an unilaterally imposed restraint on its realty. But, recent case law establishes the near futility of such efforts if the plaintiff has satisfied the minimal statutory requisites for filing the Notice.Read More ›