Nowadays more than ever, accusations of business crime must be put to the test, since the stakes in this post-Enron era are at an all-time high for an accused company's survival and its executives' personal liberty and reputation. The way we test allegations in Anglo-American law is through the adversary system. Yet, just when it's needed the most, the adversary system is increasingly sidelined. For the public company, adversarialism may no longer be an option at all.
In the post-Enron world, the SEC is ratcheting-up the stakes in many of its cases. With millions of dollars in increased funding and hundreds of additional staff, it is bringing more cases, seeking harsher penalties, and generally litigating more aggressively. If recent press releases are indicative, it is also increasingly coordinating its civil enforcement activities with criminal investigations by the Department of Justice. As one SEC district administrator stated in a recent newspaper interview: "People are looking for heads. And we're going after them."
Just when there appears to be a significant uptick in investigations for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the Fifth Circuit has issued a decision that sows further confusion over the meaning of the FCPA's criminal prohibitions.
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
On April 26, State Attorneys General from 20 states announced the settlement of claims under state deceptive trade practices laws against Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (Medco), for drug switching practices. The multi-state investigation began 2 years ago in Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington.
News from the agency that you need to know.
The City of New York filed three lawsuits in May against drug manufacturers it claims overcharged it for pharmaceuticals. The suits, brought in three district courts, claim that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Purdue Pharma L.P. kept prices artificially high on pain reliever OxyContin', antidepressant Paxil', and antibiotic Augmentin' by using false and misleading methods to extend their drugs' patents.
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Over the past few months, the Task Force on Drug Importation has held its so-called "listening sessions" with groups and individuals that would be impacted by drug importation, should it be legalized. At the meetings, U.S. Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona served as the chairman over a panel of representatives from the Department of Health and Human Services, as well as from other departments of the federal government with an interest in drug importation issues (see sidebar on page 5). The task force's members are being asked to offer recommendations to Health and Human Services' Secretary Tommy Thompson by December 2004 concerning how best to address key questions posed by Congress as part of the Medicare Prescription Drug Act, such as how drugs can safely be imported, what the impact of such imports would be on incentives to drug research and development, and how much the policing of imports would cost the government.
A Manhattan federal district court granted summary judgment dismissing a claim against a Canadian modeling agency for tortious interference with contract. NYC Management Group Inc. v. Brown-Miller. The defendant had secured New York agency representation from the plaintiff's modeling agency for 16-year-old Jessica Stam, who later disaffirmed the minor's contract based on her unhappiness with the plaintiff's agency.
