Everyone agrees that the world for those delivering legal services to Fortune 500 clients is in a state of tremendous flux. Demands placed on lawyers and firms to deliver for their clients have never been more challenging, or potentially more rewarding. This new reality has created an enormous opportunity for Canadian law firms with the ability to offer service in the U.S., and it also creates an opportunity for U.S. firms to gain access to a rich talent pool.
Thar's gold in them thar hills." Like the miner panning for gold, you can increase revenues and profits by finding nuggets of data, which has been captured in your software programs. This critical information can provide a blueprint for creating a plan for future business development that will increase your revenues and your profits. Yet, few law firms take advantage of their existing data by analyzing it and then using it strategically.
Data, such as the client referral source industry or marketing activity that generated the client, the client industry and client matter linked to the clients' revenues can be the foundation for future marketing efforts.
In recent years, many firms have reluctantly bitten various bullets and abandoned practice areas that can no longer support their fee structures. Long before the firms' decided to get out of those businesses, though, many lawyers practicing in those areas suffered steady diminution of their earning power, professional satisfaction and internal prestige. This unnecessary human cost could have been avoided, or at least minimized, if only firms recognized sooner that the services were maturing. If they had, they would have had much more time to prepare their lawyers and ease the inevitable transition to newer, more valuable services. So, what early signs warn alert firms that a service is aging?
The decision to merge your law firm with another is complex. Not only must you consider the myriad financial and business details and weigh how the firms will mix culturally, you must also carefully plan out how you will announce the decision to your support staff, clients, vendors and consultants. Each of these groups is important and each needs special attention.
Of course, you must notify the public as well, and the best way to reach this massive group is via the legal, business and local media. It makes sense to work with public relations professionals while you go through the merger process.
From what I've observed, most firms would be better off if they scrapped their marketing plans, projects, budgets and staffs completely. Save the money and spend it on summer associate swag, the holiday party, better seats at sporting events ' whatever. Why? Because marketing relies on something that many firms seem content to do without ' purpose.
After years of foot-dragging, large U.S. law firms have embraced the mainstream business practice of countering rising health care costs by steering employees and partners into managed care plans. A recent comprehensive survey of large law firms' employee benefit practices conducted by The Segal Company shows, among other findings, that less than one in five firms offers a traditional indemnity health plan today. The survey also found that health plans at law firms continue to reflect the special needs of these professional service organizations as a whole ' as well as those of the individual firms that participated.
A common expression in the tax arena is the "red flag" ' the concern that a tax deduction is so large, or the tax benefits of a transaction are so favorable to the taxpayer, that it is comparable to waving a red flag at the IRS, inviting scrutiny and possible adverse consequences. Over the past few years, certain retirement plans created under the provisions of Section 412(i) of the Internal Revenue Code have been designed using methods that are questionable, at best, in terms of compliance with the tax code and regulations. This problem became so pervasive that it was widely anticipated the IRS would respond to the red flags, and put an end to the abuses. Last month, it happened. IRS guidance and proposed regulations were enacted to try to get everyone to play by the rules. Not that the rules are bad; a 412(i) plan could still be right for you.
As previously reported in LFPBR, several states have upheld the forfeiture of non-qualified retirement benefits otherwise payable to a partner choosing to compete with the firm. In Borteck v. Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland, and Perretti, LLP (A-31-03) (April 5, 2004), the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously concluded that the retirement provisions of a law firm's partnership agreement did not violate N.J. Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 5.6, and held the competing partner to lose his retirement benefits. The case provides further guidance for firms in designing, drafting and defending enforceable forfeiture-for-competition agreements.
This article begins a feature that periodically will examine a specific section or clause in the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular (UFOC). In a UFOC, a typical third-party beneficiary clause reads like this: "No third-party beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor will be deemed, to confer rights or remedies upon any person or legal entity not a party to this Agreement."
