Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Analyzing Manufacturers' Duties with Respect to Post-Sale Safety Improvements Image

Analyzing Manufacturers' Duties with Respect to Post-Sale Safety Improvements

Kenneth Ross

According to Professors Henderson and Twerksi, the Reporters for the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, "... post-sale warnings are probably the most expansive area in the law of products liability." The authors go on to say that "[I]f you want to see people turn ashen white quickly, we recommend that you gather representatives from industry in a room and then flash the words 'post-sale warnings' on a screen." They further describe post-sale warnings as "timeless" and a "monster duty."

Features

What To Do When 'Strict' Means 'Strict' Image

What To Do When 'Strict' Means 'Strict'

Samuel W. Silver & Jennifer A. Diamantis

It is well known that the doctrine of strict liability imposes responsibility upon manufacturers without regard to their fault or the degree of care they may have exercised in designing their products. Yet, in some jurisdictions the law of strict liability is stricter than in others, and courts in these "strict-strict liability" jurisdictions may prohibit the employment of certain common defenses to product liability claims. Manufacturers that find themselves on the defense in such jurisdictions may face the unexpected and initially unpleasant news that the trial on the horizon really will be about the product, the whole product and nothing but the product, and that the sole question for the jury may be "can someone given 20/20 hindsight fathom a plausible way to make this product safer?" Such manufacturers will often find that what they were hoping to rely upon for the cornerstone of their defense — explaining who, what, where, when, why and how from the company's perspective — is not only irrelevant but also inadmissible at trial.

Features

Compliance Risk Assessment Image

Compliance Risk Assessment

Richard M. Cooper

The Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines asks the Sentencing Commission to adopt a new guideline defining "effective program to prevent and detect violations of law" as used in USSG ' 82C.5(f). The Report recommends that the definition include conducting ongoing risk assessments as one of its elements. The assessments would have two aspects: 1) a determination of "the scope and nature of the risks of violations of law associated with an organization's activities," and 2) use of the results of the assessments to "influence the design and implementation of a broad range of features of an effective [compliance] program."

Features

Business Crimes Hotline Image

Business Crimes Hotline

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

MLATs and the Foreign Discoverability Requirement Image

MLATs and the Foreign Discoverability Requirement

Stanley S. Arkin

Anyone who has gone through the cumbersome and laborious process of trying to obtain discovery from abroad through letters rogatory will appreciate the frustration that gave rise to Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties in Criminal Matters (MLATs). Generally, these treaties, which the United States has negotiated with dozens of countries, provide procedures by which prosecutors in one signatory country can obtain evidence located within the territory of the other.

In The Courts Image

In The Courts

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of recent rulings that affect your practice.

Sentencing Convicted Corporations Image

Sentencing Convicted Corporations

Gregory J. Wallance

The Ad Hoc Advisory Group to the United States Sentencing Commission on the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines (OSG) has recommended significant changes, particularly in the seven criteria for an effective compliance program to prevent and detect violations of law that, if implemented by an organization, may qualify it for a reduced fine in the event of a conviction.

Federal Circuit Holds that Importing Data is Not Patent Infringement Image

Federal Circuit Holds that Importing Data is Not Patent Infringement

Donald J. Featherstone & Jorge A. Goldstein

It is no secret that more than a few biotech and pharmaceutical companies perform drug discovery offshore and then import the results. Holders of U.S. patents on drug discovery tools (such as molecular screening methods) have wondered for years whether data or drugs resulting from such activities constitute a "product made" under The Process Patent Amendments Act of 1988 (the "Act"). The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit") &mdash; in a setback to the U.S. drug discovery industry &mdash; has now held that they do not. <i>See Bayer AG v. Housey Pharm., Inc.,</i> 340 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Avoiding Common Misperceptions and Mistakes in Patent License Agreements Image

Avoiding Common Misperceptions and Mistakes in Patent License Agreements

Jonathan Gordon & Michelle M. LeCointe

Negotiating and drafting the terms of a patent license can be difficult, contentious, and time consuming, especially when the parties are in a hurry to proceed with the broader business venture of which the license is but one part. However, those who decide to skip or skimp on the troublesome details of license drafting will often later face the consequences of a poorly thought-out license relationship &mdash; consequences that are significantly more troublesome and costlier than the burden of thoroughly and accurately documenting the intended terms of the relationship at the outset. Even more frustrating is the experience of drafting a license that diligently attempts to address the business or legal issues thought to be important at the outset of the license relationship, only to discover later that a crucial (but possibly latent) problem was overlooked or inadequately addressed.

Features

Lawyers Stump for End to Tough Patent Policy Image

Lawyers Stump for End to Tough Patent Policy

Brenda Sandburg

Patent lawyers have long chafed under rules that require them to relinquish attorney-client privilege in certain patent cases.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • The FTC Gets Into the College Athlete NIL Game
    As national champions are crowned in men's and women's basketball, hundreds of thousands of college athletes are entering the influencer marketplace for the first time and now find themselves attractive candidates in the fast growing influencer marketing arena. With influencer marketing potentially providing a 5x return on investment, many brands are eager to get into the industry, but it doesn't come without risks as the FTC Commissioner is taking a closer look at the use of influencers for marketing.
    Read More ›
  • The Roadmap of Litigation Analytics
    Litigation analytics can be considered a roadmap of sorts — an important guide to ensure the legal professional arrives at the correct litigation strategy or business plan. However, like roadmaps, litigation analytics will only be useful if it's based on data that is complete and accurate.
    Read More ›