The two federal statutes that create criminal liability for antitrust violations are arguably the broadest and most poorly defined of all federal criminal statutes, even recognizing the tortured draftsmanship of the RICO statute and the securities laws' criminal provisions.
- August 18, 2003David J. Laing
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
August 18, 2003ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Analysis of the cases important to you and your practice.
August 18, 2003ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Federal agents descend upon a manufacturing facility of a publicly traded client that makes parts for Department of Defense contractors. The agents conduct a day-long search and drive away with hundreds of boxes of documents, as well as data downloaded from company computers. You are the company's counsel, and within 2 days you piece together the government's core theories and many of the 'facts' that caused it to conduct the search.
August 18, 2003Brien T. O'Connor and Randall D. KatzOn April 1, 2003, the Fifth Circuit en banc filed an opinion that might seriously restrict the application of the False Claims Act (FCA) for the Department of Justice. United States v. Southland Management Corp., 326 F. 3d 669 (5th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The court en banc overturned a controversial decision by a divided panel last year that essentially eliminated the materiality element of the FCA.
August 18, 2003James J. GrahamThe Department of Justice is drafting defense counsel to fight its latest war: this one on corporate crime. At the beginning of this year, the DOJ effectively imposed an obligation of self-disclosure of crimes on corporations, accelerating a government-wide trend where companies, through their lawyers, are expected not only to obey the law, but also to investigate and enforce it as well.
August 18, 2003Joseph F. Savage, Jr. and Stephanie R. PrattCongress and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are driving home an important point: A company's central management is ultimately responsible for any criminal conduct by its business divisions and employees, and must therefore implement policies and procedures to ensure that it promptly discovers and corrects any potential violations.
August 18, 2003Ira H. Raphaelson, Alan M. Cohen and Jeremy MaltbyRecent cases of importance to your practice.
August 18, 2003ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Analysis of recent important cases for your practice.
August 18, 2003ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |For a person under criminal investigation, the image is a frightening one. There is pounding at your front door during the early morning hours. A voice yells, 'FBI! Open the door!' You throw on clothes, head to the front door and as you open it, agents rush by you into your living room. The FBI agent with whom your attorney has been dealing for months tells you, 'We have a warrant for your arrest. You'll have to come with us.' Your spouse and children, who have been awakened by the agents, are now seated in your living room. Your hands are cuffed behind your back and you are led from your home. Remarkably, all you can think about at this moment is that your lawyer told you the government does not arrest people in these kinds of cases. Your lawyer was wrong.
August 18, 2003Steven F. Reich

