Merger Defeats Single and Separate Ownership Claim
Failure to Refer to County Planning Board Invalidates Grant of Area Variance
Denial of Natural Resources Special Permit Upheld
Village Ratifies Extension of Lease to Cell Phone Provider
Federal Circuit Holds USPTO Can Defend PTAB Decision After Original Petitioner Drops Out
Federal Circuit Says Alice Not Intervening Change
Brief Use of Graffiti Art in HBO's Vinyl Show Found De Minimis
Chinese Film Company Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in Location Security Company's Colorado Lawsuit
Interest on Loan Tolled When Mortgagee Delayed In Filing Request for Judicial Intervention
Court Dismisses Tortious Interference Claim By Holder of First Refusal
Easement Enforceable Despite City Register's Failure to Index the Easement Against Newly Created Lot
Liquidated Damages Provision Not an Unenforceable Penalty
Occupant Established Succession Right Despite Absence of Sexual or Blood Relationship
Rent Stabilization Provision Lost When Tenant Executed Lease In Corporate Name
Predecessor Landlord Waived Prohibition on Subleases and Assignments
The justices in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association found the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act infringed on state sovereignty. The decision could transform sports and sports gambling from coast to coast.
Gov. Nathan Deal opted to veto a cybersecurity bill criticized by technology groups that would have made “unauthorized computer access” a crime.
Legislature Considers Publicity Law Update
Ruling in a matter of first impression, New York's high court dismissed suits filed by Lindsay Lohan and the daughter of ex-mobster Sammy “The Bull” Gravano against the makers of Grand Theft Auto V, by disagreeing with the plaintiff's claims that characters in the game were intended to be their look-alikes.
The Supreme Court of Indiana accepted a certified question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit involving the interpretation of the state's right-of-publicity statute.
U.S. laws require companies to retain records for years, and sometimes forever, and violating U.S. records retention laws can result in domestic fines and penalties. How can U.S. companies comply with the GDPR's “right to erasure” while still fulfilling their U.S. records retention obligations?
