Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • When it comes to practicing litigation, the use of technology is no longer optional. What is optional, however, is under which business model firms deliver this service to their clients, and how to determine which model balances the most value — to the client and the firm.

    September 02, 2017Stephen Cole
  • What Can We Tell So Far?

    How can companies plan for enforcement under the Trump administration? Here are five areas of compliance to consider.

    September 02, 2017Annette K. Ebright and Sarah F. Hutchins
  • In a case brought against former baseball player Lenny Dykstra by a social media ghost writer, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has offered the additional lesson that a writing other than a formal settlement agreement may constitute an enforceable agreement — even if one of the parties expects that additional "standard" provisions will be added to the agreement.

    September 02, 2017Thomas E.L. Dewey
  • This article examines the cyber threat facing benefit plans, explores the applicable legal landscape, and recommends steps to better equip plans to prepare for and manage data breaches.

    September 02, 2017Robert M. Projansky and Miriam S. Dubin
  • On June 19, the U.S. Supreme Court upended years of jurisprudence to hand corporations a gift: a far more stringent definition of specific jurisdiction that will force plaintiffs to bring suit in multiple state courts rather than join their claims to those in far-flung jurisdictions.

    September 02, 2017Janice G. Inman
  • Comprising the largest rewrite of U.S. food safety regulations in more than 70 years, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which was signed into law on Jan. 4, 2011, has broad implications for almost all constituents involved in the food and feed industry. But FSMA's effect on equipment lessors and other secured lenders requires some consideration and analysis.

    September 02, 2017Michael A. Leichtling
  • In Matter of Avella v. City of New York, the New York Court of Appeals enjoined development of a retail, holding that the development proposal would constitute an impermissible alienation of parkland by the City of New York. Here are the implications of that ruling.

    September 02, 2017Stewart E. Sterk