Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • In-depth discussion of recent key rulings.

    July 02, 2015Laura A. Foggan, Edward R. Brown and Jessica Cunningham Lim
  • On Jan. 12, 2015, a California Court of Appeal held unenforceable a co-tenancy provision in a retail lease that allowed the tenant to accept possession of the premises but thereafter have no obligation to pay rent or open for business, even though the provision had been negotiated by two sophisticated parties with leasing expertise.

    July 02, 2015M. Rosie Rees and Stephanie J. Kim
  • This article describes some of the reasons law firms are cyber-attack targets, steps they can take to reduce their risk, and what clients are doing to encourage law firms in those efforts.

    July 02, 2015David Ray and Reggie Pool
  • Even though a seller's reclamation rights may find their underpinnings in the common law and in the UCC, there are strict limitations on the seller's reclamation rights under the Bankruptcy Code.

    July 02, 2015Benjamin Seigel
  • It is well founded that the pleading standard set forth in Twombly and Iqbal applies to claims involving Class III medical devices. In these actions, however, federal courts have taken different approaches to the application of the two rulings.

    July 02, 2015James H. Rotondo, Kaitlin A. Canty and Michael P. Pohorylo
  • Well-crafted policies and procedures are an essential part of the operation of modern health-care facilities. However, in the event of a bad outcome, policies and procedures become evidence in litigation, and "violations" frequently become the central focus of malpractice claims.

    July 02, 2015Neil Edwards and Meg Twomey
  • It is not uncommon for a couple to reconcile. The issue is what, if any, impact the couple's reconciliation has on their settlement agreement. The answer is: It depends.

    July 02, 2015John P. Whiteman III
  • On Feb. 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark ruling, overturning precedent only two decades after it held that Canadian citizens have the right to end their lives, but if done with the assistance of a physician, that physician could be held liable. This highly anticipated decision is expected to encourage the efforts of right-to-die advocates in the United States and abroad.

    July 02, 2015Michael D. Brophy
  • In-depth analysis of two important rulings.

    July 02, 2015ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |