Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • In-house counsel for eBay Inc., Google Inc. and the National Music Publishers' Association agreed last month that the U.S. copyright system needs improvement, but they offered different views about how to approach reform.

    November 30, 2014Andrew Ramonas
  • In upholding a statutory damages award against a tavern owner who failed to obtain a public performance license for music used in the venue, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit formally embraced the principle that a co-owner of a copyright may sue for infringement.

    November 30, 2014Stan Soocher
  • Discussion of a case involving a teen's suicide.

    November 30, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Two pivotal cases are discussed.

    November 30, 2014ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • A look at med mal-related legislation in New York and California.

    November 30, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Companies that use captive insurance companies to manage risk are increasingly being victimized by excess insurance companies and reinsurers that participate in their insurance programs. But captives and their owners can proactively avoid some of these common pitfalls.

    November 30, 2014John N. Ellison and Luke E. Debevec
  • Given that lawyers are not sales professionals and only spend a small amount of their time focused on business development, and given that they already have a full-time job, it's important to keep the business development approach as simple as possible. Some ideas related to keeping it simple follow:

    November 30, 2014Bruce Alltop
  • In the preference avoidance context, the insolvency of the debtor is an element of the prima facie case that is not commonly litigated. When it is litigated, however, the scope of a debtor's liabilities can make or break the case.

    November 30, 2014Aram Ordubegian and M. Douglas Flahaut
  • The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit "clarified certain aspects of [its] false advertising jurisprudence" and held that, where literal falsity and deliberate deception have been proved in a market with only two players, it is appropriate to use legal presumptions of consumer confusion and injury for the purposes of finding liability in a false advertising case brought under the Lanham Act. Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.p.A.

    November 30, 2014Bruce Colbath