Expert analysis of two major rulings.
- August 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
Steven Phillips spent 25 years in a Texas prison for a crime he did not commit, a miscarriage of justice for which the state of Texas compensated him with millions of dollars. And he will not have to pay $114,459.50 of that money to his ex-wife, thanks to a recent ruling.
August 02, 2014John CouncilThe state of New Jersey is home to the headquarters of 17 of the the top 20 drug-producing companies in the world. An incentive for pharmaceuticals manufacturers to move to or stay in New Jersey is surely its business-friendly laws. One such law has been at the center of several litigations nationwide, as New Jersey drug manufacturers try to export to other states the favorable treatment they receive in their home state.
August 02, 2014Janice InmanA corporate successor's right to coverage under a predecessor's policy is not a foregone conclusion. Thus, to protect against paying claims in error, an insurer's first line of defense is awareness of the issues.
August 02, 2014Jennifer R. Devery and Rachel GartIn ABC v. Aereo, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit's holding that Aereo did not directly infringe the copyright owners' public performance rights through the operation of the "Watch Now" function of its service.
August 02, 2014J. Alexander LawrencePomegranate juice is the subject of an intense legal battle between POM Wonderful and Coca-Cola Co. In its Lanham Act challenge, POM alleges that Coke's juice product's name, label, marketing and advertising mislead consumers into thinking the product is mostly a pomegranate and blueberry juice when it in fact is mostly apple and grape juice.
August 02, 2014Kyle-Beth HilferAfter Kleban v. Ann Taylor, when a mall or shopping center landlord is marketing space and offers a potential retail tenant a co-tenancy provision, the most applicable legal maxim is caveat venditor, let the seller beware. Landlords can suffer great unintended consequences from a co-tenancy clause that is negotiated as an accommodation to get a tenant into the space and then explodes years later.
August 02, 2014Seth A. FerskoIn-depth commentary and analysis of two rulings.
August 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Analysis of a decision in which the D.C. Circuit ruled on attorney-client privilege protections for corporate internal Investigations
August 02, 2014ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters |

