Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Several cases are discussed.

Features

Drug & Device News Image

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of several important happenings.

Features

Third Parties at Court-Ordered Psychological Evaluations Image

Third Parties at Court-Ordered Psychological Evaluations

Janice G. Inman

What can litigants, their attorneys, and their medical examiners expect from the courts when conflicts over third-party presence during a court-ordered psychiatric examination arise?

The Role of the Mediator in Med Mal Cases Image

The Role of the Mediator in Med Mal Cases

Roseann Lynn Brenner

Tips to make the mediation process smooth and profitable.

Features

A Roadmap to Economic Damages in Med Mal Matters Image

A Roadmap to Economic Damages in Med Mal Matters

Chad L. Staller

A good understanding of the basic elements of damages and the issues that might be involved is essential to effective representation. Here is an in-depth review.

Verdicts Image

Verdicts

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of an important ruling.

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Several items of interest.

Features

Drug & Device News Image

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A discussion of several key cases.

The Role of the Mediator in Med-Mal Cases Image

The Role of the Mediator in Med-Mal Cases

Roseann Lynn Brenner

For litigants today, faced with the potential of a long and drawn-out jury trial, along with the uncertainties that accompany such an exercise, mediation is becoming a very important alternative in the dispute resolution process.

Whistleblowing and Peer Review Image

Whistleblowing and Peer Review

David M. Axelrad, Peder K. Batalden & H. Thomas Watson

Last month, we discussed the fact that one long-settled aspect of the California Supreme Court's peer-review jurisprudence is the exhaustion-of-remedies doctrine. We stated that two of California's intermediate appellate courts addressed doctors' whistleblower claims ' with diametrically opposed results.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • The Right to Associate in the Defense
    The "right to associate" permits the insurer to work with the insured to investigate, defend, or settle a claim. Such partnerships protect the insurer and can prove beneficial to the insured's underlying case and ultimate exposure.
    Read More ›
  • Delaware Chancery Court Takes Fresh Look At Zone of Insolvency
    Over a decade ago, a Delaware Chancery Court's footnote in <i>Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland, N.V. v. Pathe Communications</i>, 1991 WL 277613 (Del. Ch. 1991), established the "zone of insolvency" as something to be feared by directors and officers and served as a catalyst for countless creditor lawsuits. Claims by creditors committee and trustees against directors and officers for breach of fiduciary duties owed to creditors have since become commonplace. But in a decision that may have equally great repercussion both in the Boardroom and in bankruptcy cases, the Delaware Chancery Court has revisited zone-of-insolvency case law and limited this ever-expanding legal theory.
    Read More ›