While the term ripeness may conjure up images of fruit or produce, in federal litigation it functions as a pragmatic barrier against premature judicial intervention. The plaintiffs in 61 E. Main St. Assoc., LLC v Vil. of Washingtonville felt the full force of this doctrine after their claims alleging unlawful, discriminatory delay in approving their project were dismissed as unripe for adjudication. The Southern District of New York reaffirmed the Second Circuit’s longstanding approach to zoning disputes: No Final Decision, No Federal Lawsuit.
- February 01, 2026Leo Dorfman and Vincent Ferry
Second Circuit Affirms Federal Abstention from Action Contesting Validity of Ban On Income-Source Discrimination
February 01, 2026New York Real Estate Law Reporter StaffChurch Entitled to Tax Exemption Because Town Did Not Prove Use Was a Violation of Zoning OrdinanceDetermination In Partition Action Precludes Adverse Possession ClaimQuestions of Fact About Confidential Relationship Precludes Summary Judgment On Constructive Trust ClaimEasement Rights Clarified
February 01, 2026New York Real Estate Law Reporter StaffClaim That Town Violated SEQRA ReinstatedGrant of Area Variance UpheldOrdinance Violates Free Exercise Clause
February 01, 2026New York Real Estate Law Reporter StaffClaims By Unit Owners Not Barred By “As Is” Clause In Purchase Agreement
February 01, 2026New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.





