Delaware Chancery Court Takes Fresh Look At Zone of Insolvency
Over a decade ago, a Delaware Chancery Court's footnote in <i>Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland, N.V. v. Pathe Communications</i>, 1991 WL 277613 (Del. Ch. 1991), established the "zone of insolvency" as something to be feared by directors and officers and served as a catalyst for countless creditor lawsuits. Claims by creditors committee and trustees against directors and officers for breach of fiduciary duties owed to creditors have since become commonplace. But in a decision that may have equally great repercussion both in the Boardroom and in bankruptcy cases, the Delaware Chancery Court has revisited zone-of-insolvency case law and limited this ever-expanding legal theory.
The Devil in the Details
In theory, a borrower's issuance of junior secured debt is a boon for its senior secured lender. The borrower obtains additional capital, and the claims of the junior lender against shared collateral, since "subordinated," don't diminish the senior lender's prospects for repayment. In practice, however, a senior secured lender should view proposed junior secured financing skeptically because the existence of such debt can become highly problematic for the senior lender. The key to protecting the senior lender lies in properly negotiating and documenting the intercreditor agreement with the junior lender to eliminate, or at least minimize the myriad of ways in which the junior lender's rights may, in practice, limit -- or even trump -- those of the senior lender.
The Trouble with Constructive Trusts
The equitable remedy of constructive trust is employed when "property has been acquired in such circumstances that the holder of the legal title may not in good conscience retain the beneficial interest," and therefore equity converts him into a trustee. <i>In re Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A.</i>, 961 F.2d 341, 353 (2d Cir. 1992). This legal theory arises in bankruptcy cases when a non-debtor party with a pre-petition contract, which ostensibly grants such party an ownership interest in funds or which establishes an agency relationship with a debtor, seeks, in the bankruptcy case, to assert its ownership rights to the funds held by the debtor.
The Costly Road
The voluntary winding-up (<i>liquidation volontaire</i>) of a corporation is one of the many, though expensive, options available to shareholders wishing to withdraw from a corporation facing financial difficulties. Other options include the sale of their stake or of the corporation itself, possibly following a restructuring. The corporation may be sold as a whole or, where these exist, through the divestment of one or more branches of activity. The transaction may then be effected through various share deals for the different subsidiaries, or through the sale of assets, subsequent to which the corporation will still have to be wound up. A lease of business (<i>location g'rance</i>) followed by the sale of the business may also be an option.
In Search of the Holy Grail
Where, as is generally the case, stock of a bankrupt company changes hands upon emergence, the company may undergo an "ownership change" and the use of its net operating losses (NOLs) may be subject to limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). This article discusses the loss limitation rules, in general, and one of the special rules under Section 382 of the Code that applies to bankrupt companies, specifically.
Asbestos and Mass Tort Claims
Asbestos-related bankruptcies are prevalent for various reasons, including expense of traditional tort litigation, lack of either state or federal procedures to handle mass litigation, disputes between insurer and insured, and need for many companies' creditors and shareholders to achieve certainty with large current and contingent asbestos liabilities. Bankruptcy remains an attractive alternative and sometimes last resort because section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a mechanism for companies faced with overwhelming asbestos liability to resolve current and future asbestos claims by channeling them to a trust, thereby allowing the effected company to avoid what could result in an inevitable liquidation. One necessary component of this channeling mechanism is section 524(g)(4)(B)(i) of the Bankruptcy Code which requires the Bankruptcy Court appoint "a legal representative for the purpose of protecting the rights of persons that might subsequently assert [asbestos claims] ..." 11 U.S.C. ' 524(g)(4)(B)(i), commonly referred to as a future claimants' representative (FCR).
The Effects of Terminating a Pension Plan in Bankruptcy
Oftentimes, one of the largest commitments of a company is its ongoing funding obligations under its pension plan. Contribution obligations to a company-sponsored pension plan will often influence the timing of a financially troubled company's bankruptcy filing. An example of this is the Chapter 11 case of United Air Lines (United) and its affiliates. United viewed its obligations to make significant contributions to its pension plans as somewhat incompatible with its need to create a fiscally strong enterprise so as to effectively compete with low- cost carriers that do not have the same economic burdens.
The Retail Debtor's 'Year in Review'
Welcome to the most magical time of a retailer's year -- the Holiday Selling Season. It seems fitting as retailers enter this "make-it-or-break-it" period that we examine the Retail Debtors' Year in Review. After all, if Santa is kind to bankruptcy professionals, a few retailers currently holding on will go down the ... chimney. If 2004 provides any indication as to how some courts are approaching issues affecting retailers, various courts were anti-vendor in special relief; pro-contract party regarding assumption and assignment issues; and, when it comes to the asset-disposition auction process, it is anybody's game!
Litigation
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
