Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search

We found 1,594 results for "New York Real Estate Law Reporter"...

Cooperatives & Condominiums
September 01, 2004
Recent cases of importance to your practice.
Real Property Law
July 30, 2004
The latest rulings of interest to you and your practice.
MERS and the Recording Act
July 30, 2004
In <i>Merscorp. v. Romaine</i> (<i>see</i> page 7, <i>infra</i>), Suffolk County Supreme Court was faced with a clash between the traditionally local real property recording system and the increasingly national secondary mortgage market. The County Clerk's office had refused to accept for recording instruments filed in the name of MERS (Mortgage Electronic Recording Systems, Inc.), prompting a proceeding by MERS and the operating company that owns the MERS system for a writ of mandamus compelling the County Clerk to record and index MERS instruments. The case resulted in a split decision: the County Clerk is required to record MERS mortgages, but not assignments or certificates of discharge. The court's opinion, however, reveals some misunderstanding both of the MERS system and of the recording act.
Landlord & Tenant
July 30, 2004
The latest cases.
Index
July 30, 2004
A complete list of what's inside this issue.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
July 30, 2004
Important cases for you to consider.
Development
July 30, 2004
The latest cases of importance to you and your practice.
Index
June 30, 2004
A list of everything contained in this issue, for your easy access.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
June 30, 2004
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Development
June 30, 2004
Recent cases you need to know.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›