Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search

We found 1,606 results for "New York Real Estate Law Reporter"...

Direct Evidence Not Required in Mixed Motive Case
September 02, 2003
Last month, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a plaintiff must present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction under Title VII, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. <i>Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa</i>, 2003 WL 21310219 (U.S. June 9, 2003) The Court unanimously held that direct evidence is not required.
Real Property Law
September 02, 2003
Recent rulings of importance to your practice.
Landlord & Tenant
September 02, 2003
Recent cases of importance to your practice.
Development
September 02, 2003
Recent rulings of importance to your practice.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
September 02, 2003
Recent rulings of importance to your practice.
Index
September 02, 2003
A comprehensive list of key cases discussed in this issue.
Co-op's Fact Findings Held Binding on Eviction Court
September 02, 2003
<b><i>Part One of a Two-Part Article.</b></i>This commentary discusses ' critically ' a rule recently adopted by a unanimous Court of Appeals in a case in which a housing cooperative was attempting to evict a tenant deemed objectionable by his fellow shareholders. <i>40 W. 67th St. Corp. v. Pullman</i> (5/13/03). In order to understand fully the significance of the <i>Pullman</i> rule, it must be viewed in context. The general subject is the power of a landlord to terminate a tenancy based on a lease provision authorizing such action if the tenant becomes objectionable. More specifically, the issue is what role the courts are to play in determining whether or not the tenant did or did not do the things that he is accused of doing, which things, we will assume, all would agree would render him objectionable.
Decisions of Interest
September 01, 2003
Recent decisions of interest to you and your practice.
John Gaal's Ethics Corner
September 01, 2003
Your ethics questions answered by the expert.
A Word to the Wise
September 01, 2003
Plaintiff seeks to admit testimony relating to a similar claim of sex discrimination raised by a co-worker. She also notes that in a department of 20, there are only five women. Is the co-worker's testimony admissible? Is testimony relating to the office's demographics probative?

MOST POPULAR STORIES