Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Fosamax and the Public Hazards Discovery Doctrine
September 28, 2006
In September 1995, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ('FDA') approved Merck's compound alendronate for various uses, including the treatment of osteoporosis and Paget's Disease. Alendronate is marketed by Merck as Fosamax'. It is one of Merck's biggest sellers, with approximating $3.5 billion per year in sales.
Meet & Confer Checklist
September 28, 2006
Preparing for the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) will require careful planning and preparation. Following are steps designed to help general counsel more effectively negotiate the scope of electronic discovery at an FRCP Rule 26(f) Meet & Confer conference.
<b>Online Exclusive:</b> Class Action Lawsuit Filed in Wake of AOL Search Data Gaffe
September 27, 2006
AOL is facing a possible class action lawsuit from subscribers whose online searches were compiled and placed online by the company in July. The search history database, which was put online on July 31, quickly moved outside the protected site where AOL placed it, and newspaper reporters and researchers were able to identify individuals on the database by analyzing their search histories. By the time AOL pulled the database 10 days later, the information had, in effect, 'become public record,' according to the lawsuit.
<b>Online Exclusive:</b> President's Identity Theft Task Force Issues Recommendations
September 27, 2006
The President's Identity Theft Task Force recently issued its interim recommendations covering an array of procedures that government agencies should take to reduce the potential for ID theft, respond to incidents, and protect consumers.
Data Mining
September 27, 2006
Few technological advancements or social movements have impacted matrimonial law as profoundly as the computer/electronic age. Today, litigants have a virtual Pandora's box of incredibly vast yet retrievable information at their fingertips, which all too often remains underutilized or undiscovered. Currently, stored data can be retrieved from joint marital assets such as computers, cell phones or even facsimile devices with memory capabilities. The information stems from usage, whether explicitly 'saved' by the computer operator or not. It can later be deciphered or interpreted by a trained professional and can yield countless bits of information to assist in discovery.
NY Appellate Court Nullifies Attorney-Fee Provision
September 27, 2006
For the first time in New York appellate history, an appeals court in Brooklyn declared unenforceable provisions of a prenuptial agreement that barred a spouse from seeking attorney fees. The decision is the first in which an appeals court had nullified part of a prenuptial agreement concerning attorney fees, rather than the whole agreement.
Protecting Trust Assets from a Divorcing Spouse
September 27, 2006
When spouses divorce, they may be surprised to discover that certain trust assets may not be protected from each others' reach. It is often difficult to find a bullet-proof trust, holding assets firmly and securely away from the divorcing spouse.
Background Checks: The New Burden of Proof
September 27, 2006
Negligent hiring cases typically turn on whether a background check that was forgone would have helped to reveal an employee's propensity to erupt in violence or commit fraud. But a new burden of proof may be on the horizon.
Rethinking the Rule 68 'Offer of Judgment'
September 27, 2006
With the ever-increasing costs of litigation, litigants often take steps to try and control these expenditures. Settling cases early, while not always an attractive option, is nonetheless one way to control these costs. Limiting recovery of attorneys' fees is obviously an approach that may lead to a settlement. Along these lines, defendants, particularly in civil rights cases, have turned to the 'offer of judgment' provision set forth in Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Federal Tax Incentives for Small Business
September 27, 2006
The federal tax code targets small businesses with a social conscience in an effort to encourage compliance with federal disabilities rights laws. There are tax credits and deductions that promote the employment of, and accessibility for, disabled persons. It is through these tax incentives that small businesses are permitted to defray certain costs associated with: 1) the employment of persons with disabilities; and 2) the provision of accessibility to public accommodations for persons with disabilities. Irrespective of whether a small business is an independent business, a distributorship, or part of a franchise system, it cannot afford to ignore the tangible social and economic benefits these tax incentives provide.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›
  • Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
    Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
    Read More ›
  • Conducting Discovery in Japan
    Conducting discovery in Japan is not easy and litigants should not expect to obtain nearly the same quantity or quality of information from Japan. However, if you know the available discovery devices and the special procedures to take advantage of those devices, discovery may not be lost.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›