<b>Anatomy of a Practice:</b> Washington, DC's Jenner & Block Builds Music and Movie Client Base
November 01, 2005
Three years ago, the closest most lawyers at Jenner & Block came to the entertainment industry were the compact discs its partners bought or the movies its associates rented. But now, Jenner & Block has been tapped to solidify the industry's role on the Web, edging out law firms with longer histories representing publishing and production companies. Add that to Jenner & Block's recent victory as lead Supreme Court counsel in <i>MGM Studios v. Grokster</i>, and the firm is quickly shaping up as a prominent player in the expanding industry.
Bit Parts
November 01, 2005
Recent developments in entertainment law.
Ringtones Breed Tension Within Music Industry
November 01, 2005
By 2004, mastertones were the hot new thing. They had replaced polyphonic ringtones (multipitched tunes), which had replaced monophonic ringtones. Mastertones were compressed snippets of studio-recorded music. In order to offer them to the public, ringtone content aggregators needed to obtain both publishing clearance and permission from those who held the rights to the recordings. That meant negotiating with record companies.
<b>Decision of Note:</b> Rapper Isn't Public Figure
November 01, 2005
The Court of Appeals of Georgia, Fourth Division, found that a local rap artist wasn't a public figure for purposes of a defamation suit over comments made about him on a local radio station.
Defining Metadata
November 01, 2005
A recent Kansas decision ' <i>Williams v. Sprint/United Mgmt Co.</i> ' represents one of the most important court opinions on metadata and parties' obligations to produce it in response to a legal discovery request. The plaintiffs requested a "native" production of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets to determine whether there were "any actual other columns or types of information available" on them. After receiving the spreadsheets, the plaintiffs claimed that the defendant "scrubbed" the spreadsheet files to remove metadata without producing a log of the information scrubbed. The plaintiffs also asserted the defendant locked cells and data on the spreadsheets, preventing the plaintiffs from accessing those cells. Although the court did not sanction the defendant, it ordered the defendant to produce the spreadsheets' metadata and to produce "unlocked" versions of those spreadsheets. The court held that "when a party is ordered to produce electronic documents as they are maintained in the ordinary course of business, the producing party should produce the electronic documents with their metadata intact, unless that party timely objects to production of metadata, the parties agree that the metadata should not be produced, or the producing party requests a protective order."
New Rules for e-Evidence: The Case For The Defense
November 01, 2005
More than a few attorneys have so far managed to stave off the fateful day when they truly will have to address electronic evidence. Either they have been fortunate or smart in their selection of cases, or someone else has taken care of these issues for them. Or maybe they and opposing counsel have quietly decided that there was really nothing very interesting in those e-mails and that the paper documents will be adequate. <br>However, that fateful day is arriving quickly as proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure come closer to final approval.
In-House e-Discovery Processing: Much More Than Software
November 01, 2005
Many law-firm clients, horrified by the expense of having their electronic data collected and processed by outside discovery specialists, press their law firms to find less expensive ways to get these materials ready for production in discovery. Fortunately (and conveniently), vendors offer a variety of products that law firms could use to process digital discovery materials in-house. <br>Seeing the possibility of generating additional revenue while reducing a client's out-of-pocket expenses, many law firms' technology and training committees are being tempted to add internal electronic data discovery (EDD) processing services. Relatively few law firms, however, have analyzed the full range of technical and legal issues that come with offering these services.
Why Purchasing D&O Insurance Is No Longer Enough
November 01, 2005
The media is rife with references to high-profile corporate scandals. Although the fate of those responsible for corporate misconduct is well publicized, the innocent corporate officials impacted by such scandals are rarely mentioned. In an effort to protect directors and officers, corporations allocate significant capital to buying directors' and officers' ("D&O") liability insurance. However, in today's environment of increasing numbers of corporate scandals, even innocent directors and officers sometimes find themselves stripped of the very protection such policies are meant to afford by insurance companies seeking to avoid large exposures. Allegations of corporate fraud have lead insurance companies to invoke exclusionary provisions and increasingly to seek the remedy of rescission. Although procuring D&O insurance coverage reflects a corporation's realization of and appreciation for the risk faced by directors and officers, corporations must ensure that the policies they purchase actually provide the protection sought. This article examines recent trends in court decisions regarding D&O insurance in cases of corporate fraud and suggests methods by which corporations can attempt to maximize the protection provided by their D&O policies, particularly for innocent corporate officials.
Case Briefs
November 01, 2005
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
